[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CABymUCOWXUMgA-x8z3DonANYnUqTyJYgoekXTxALK05ihE+tGA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 3 Sep 2024 15:52:54 +0800
From: Jun Nie <jun.nie@...aro.org>
To: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org>
Cc: Rob Clark <robdclark@...il.com>, Abhinav Kumar <quic_abhinavk@...cinc.com>,
Sean Paul <sean@...rly.run>, Marijn Suijten <marijn.suijten@...ainline.org>,
David Airlie <airlied@...il.com>, Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>,
Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@...ux.intel.com>, Maxime Ripard <mripard@...nel.org>,
Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@...e.de>, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, freedreno@...ts.freedesktop.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 14/21] drm/msm/dpu: Support quad-pipe in SSPP checking
Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org> 于2024年8月29日周四 19:38写道:
>
> > @@ -1033,13 +1030,10 @@ static int dpu_plane_atomic_check(struct drm_plane *plane,
> > return -E2BIG;
> > }
> >
> > - /*
> > - * Use multirect for wide plane. We do not support dynamic
> > - * assignment of SSPPs, so we know the configuration.
> > - */
> > pipe->multirect_index = DPU_SSPP_RECT_0;
> > pipe->multirect_mode = DPU_SSPP_MULTIRECT_PARALLEL;
> >
> > + r_pipe->sspp = pipe->sspp;
>
> NAK
>
I do not understand what's your point here. If multi-rectangle mode is
used, the 2 sw_pipe share a
SSPP structure. Otherwise the right half of mixer pair does not work
and no display on that side,
because there is no SSPP to handle in r_pipe setup.
>
> --
> With best wishes
> Dmitry
Powered by blists - more mailing lists