[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAA8EJppMkd4QmQHiFGNQNRyCh6S3BGqcQ7Deoag25AjH9rJwdA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 3 Sep 2024 11:30:09 +0300
From: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org>
To: Jun Nie <jun.nie@...aro.org>
Cc: Rob Clark <robdclark@...il.com>, Abhinav Kumar <quic_abhinavk@...cinc.com>,
Sean Paul <sean@...rly.run>, Marijn Suijten <marijn.suijten@...ainline.org>,
David Airlie <airlied@...il.com>, Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>,
Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@...ux.intel.com>, Maxime Ripard <mripard@...nel.org>,
Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@...e.de>, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, freedreno@...ts.freedesktop.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Jonathan Marek <jonathan@...ek.ca>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/21] drm/msm/dsi: fix DSC width for the bonded DSI case
On Tue, 3 Sept 2024 at 10:32, Jun Nie <jun.nie@...aro.org> wrote:
>
> Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org> 于2024年8月29日周四 18:54写道:
> >
> > On Thu, 29 Aug 2024 at 13:19, Jun Nie <jun.nie@...aro.org> wrote:
> > >
> > > From: Jonathan Marek <jonathan@...ek.ca>
> > >
> > > For the bonded DSI case, DSC pic_width and timing calculations should use
> > > the width of a single panel instead of the total combined width.
> >
> > What is a "single panel"? Please rephrase the commit message so that
> > it reads logically.
>
> Yeah, it is a bit confusing without the usage case explanation. "single DSI
> interface" shall be much better here. Because bonded-DSI can work with
> a single panel with 2 DSI, or with 2 panels with one DSI on each panel.
Yes, it sounds much better.
> >
> > >
> > > Bonded DSI can be used to drive a single panel having two input
> > > channels, or to drive two panels with a input channel on every panel that
> > > behave like single panel for display controller.
> >
> > Missing actual action. See Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst
> >
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Jonathan Marek <jonathan@...ek.ca>
> >
> > As pointed out during internal review, missing Fixes tag. Any reason
> > for ignoring it?
>
> Sorry, it is missed by mistaken. I am just more familiar with
> "Signed-off-by" than
> "Fixes:" tag, so not sensitive to Fixed tag and miss it when you
> mention it. Will
> add it.
Well, the regular rule of reviews applies: if you don't agree or don't
understand, please reply first.
--
With best wishes
Dmitry
Powered by blists - more mailing lists