linux-kernel - [PATCH v5 5/7] udmabuf: introduce udmabuf init and deinit helper

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20240903083818.3071759-6-link@vivo.com>
Date: Tue,  3 Sep 2024 16:38:10 +0800
From: Huan Yang <link@...o.com>
To: vivek.kasireddy@...el.com,
	Sumit Semwal <sumit.semwal@...aro.org>,
	Christian König <christian.koenig@....com>,
	Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@...hat.com>,
	linux-media@...r.kernel.org,
	dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
	linaro-mm-sig@...ts.linaro.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: opensource.kernel@...o.com,
	Huan Yang <link@...o.com>
Subject: [PATCH v5 5/7] udmabuf: introduce udmabuf init and deinit helper

After udmabuf is allocated, its resources need to be initialized,
including various array structures. The current array structure has
already been greatly expanded.

Also, before udmabuf needs to be kfree, the occupied resources need to
be released.

This part is repetitive and maybe overlooked.

This patch give a helper function when init and deinit, by this,
deduce duplicate code.

Signed-off-by: Huan Yang <link@...o.com>
---
 drivers/dma-buf/udmabuf.c | 52 +++++++++++++++++++++++----------------
 1 file changed, 31 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/dma-buf/udmabuf.c b/drivers/dma-buf/udmabuf.c
index ca2b21c5c57f..254d9ec3d9f3 100644
--- a/drivers/dma-buf/udmabuf.c
+++ b/drivers/dma-buf/udmabuf.c
@@ -226,6 +226,28 @@ static int add_to_unpin_list(struct list_head *unpin_list,
 	return 0;
 }
 
+static __always_inline int init_udmabuf(struct udmabuf *ubuf, pgoff_t pgcnt)
+{
+	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&ubuf->unpin_list);
+
+	ubuf->folios = kvmalloc_array(pgcnt, sizeof(*ubuf->folios), GFP_KERNEL);
+	if (!ubuf->folios)
+		return -ENOMEM;
+
+	ubuf->offsets = kvcalloc(pgcnt, sizeof(*ubuf->offsets), GFP_KERNEL);
+	if (!ubuf->offsets)
+		return -ENOMEM;
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static __always_inline void deinit_udmabuf(struct udmabuf *ubuf)
+{
+	unpin_all_folios(&ubuf->unpin_list);
+	kvfree(ubuf->offsets);
+	kvfree(ubuf->folios);
+}
+
 static void release_udmabuf(struct dma_buf *buf)
 {
 	struct udmabuf *ubuf = buf->priv;
@@ -234,9 +256,7 @@ static void release_udmabuf(struct dma_buf *buf)
 	if (ubuf->sg)
 		put_sg_table(dev, ubuf->sg, DMA_BIDIRECTIONAL);
 
-	unpin_all_folios(&ubuf->unpin_list);
-	kvfree(ubuf->offsets);
-	kvfree(ubuf->folios);
+	deinit_udmabuf(ubuf);
 	kfree(ubuf);
 }
 
@@ -396,33 +416,24 @@ static long udmabuf_create(struct miscdevice *device,
 	if (!ubuf)
 		return -ENOMEM;
 
-	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&ubuf->unpin_list);
 	pglimit = (size_limit_mb * 1024 * 1024) >> PAGE_SHIFT;
 	for (i = 0; i < head->count; i++) {
 		if (!PAGE_ALIGNED(list[i].offset))
-			goto err;
+			goto err_noinit;
 		if (!PAGE_ALIGNED(list[i].size))
-			goto err;
+			goto err_noinit;
 
 		pgcnt += list[i].size >> PAGE_SHIFT;
 		if (pgcnt > pglimit)
-			goto err;
+			goto err_noinit;
 	}
 
 	if (!pgcnt)
-		goto err;
+		goto err_noinit;
 
-	ubuf->folios = kvmalloc_array(pgcnt, sizeof(*ubuf->folios), GFP_KERNEL);
-	if (!ubuf->folios) {
-		ret = -ENOMEM;
+	ret = init_udmabuf(ubuf, pgcnt);
+	if (ret)
 		goto err;
-	}
-
-	ubuf->offsets = kvcalloc(pgcnt, sizeof(*ubuf->offsets), GFP_KERNEL);
-	if (!ubuf->offsets) {
-		ret = -ENOMEM;
-		goto err;
-	}
 
 	for (i = 0; i < head->count; i++) {
 		struct file *memfd = fget(list[i].memfd);
@@ -446,9 +457,8 @@ static long udmabuf_create(struct miscdevice *device,
 	return ret;
 
 err:
-	unpin_all_folios(&ubuf->unpin_list);
-	kvfree(ubuf->offsets);
-	kvfree(ubuf->folios);
+	deinit_udmabuf(ubuf);
+err_noinit:
 	kfree(ubuf);
 	return ret;
 }
-- 
2.45.2