[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <46e7758b-c9d1-d381-3959-16cb943e5de5@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 3 Sep 2024 12:15:28 +0200 (CEST)
From: Mikulas Patocka <mpatocka@...hat.com>
To: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
cc: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@...nel.org>, dm-devel@...ts.linux.dev,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] dm-integrity: introduce the Inline mode
On Mon, 26 Aug 2024, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> Hi Mikulas,
>
> On Tue, 25 Jun 2024, Mikulas Patocka wrote:
> > This commit introduces a new 'I' mode for dm-integrity.
> >
> > The 'I' mode may be selected if the underlying device has non-power-of-2
> > sector size. In this mode, dm-integrity will store integrity data
> > directly in device's sectors and it will not use journal.
> >
> > This mode improves performance and reduces flash wear because there would
> > be no journal writes.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Mikulas Patocka <mpatocka@...hat.com>
>
> Thanks for your patch, which is now commit fb0987682c629c1d
> ("dm-integrity: introduce the Inline mode") in v6.11-rc1.
>
> > @@ -4433,9 +4737,12 @@ static int dm_integrity_ctr(struct dm_ta
> > ti->error = "Block size doesn't match the information in
> > superblock";
> > goto bad;
> > }
> > - if (!le32_to_cpu(ic->sb->journal_sections)) {
> > + if (!le32_to_cpu(ic->sb->journal_sections) != (ic->mode == 'I')) {
>
> As reporting before in e.g. [1], this is causing build failures with
> gcc-5 and -Werror:
>
> drivers/md/dm-integrity.c:4718:52: error: logical not is only applied to
> the left hand side of comparison [-Werror=logical-not-parentheses]
> if (!le32_to_cpu(ic->sb->journal_sections) != (ic->mode == 'I')) {
Hi
I fixed it. The fix will be submitted upstream in the next merge window.
Mikulas
Powered by blists - more mailing lists