[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <f7c57e76-b890-491f-880d-62d060b7b31e@tuxon.dev>
Date: Tue, 3 Sep 2024 14:00:11 +0300
From: claudiu beznea <claudiu.beznea@...on.dev>
To: Biju Das <biju.das.jz@...renesas.com>,
Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>
Cc: "vkoul@...nel.org" <vkoul@...nel.org>,
"kishon@...nel.org" <kishon@...nel.org>, "robh@...nel.org"
<robh@...nel.org>, "krzk+dt@...nel.org" <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
"conor+dt@...nel.org" <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
"p.zabel@...gutronix.de" <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>,
"geert+renesas@...der.be" <geert+renesas@...der.be>,
"magnus.damm@...il.com" <magnus.damm@...il.com>,
"gregkh@...uxfoundation.org" <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
"mturquette@...libre.com" <mturquette@...libre.com>,
"sboyd@...nel.org" <sboyd@...nel.org>,
Yoshihiro Shimoda <yoshihiro.shimoda.uh@...esas.com>,
"linux-phy@...ts.infradead.org" <linux-phy@...ts.infradead.org>,
"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-renesas-soc@...r.kernel.org" <linux-renesas-soc@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-usb@...r.kernel.org" <linux-usb@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linux-clk@...r.kernel.org" <linux-clk@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-pm@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
Claudiu Beznea <claudiu.beznea.uj@...renesas.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/16] Add initial USB support for the Renesas RZ/G3S SoC
On 03.09.2024 13:31, Biju Das wrote:
>>> During boot clr USB PWR READY signal in TF-A.
>>> STR case, suspend set USB PWR READY signal in TF-A.
>>> STR case, resume clr USB PWR READY signal in TF-A.
>> As I said previously, it can be done in different ways. My point was to let Linux set what it needs
>> for all it's devices to work. I think the way to go forward is a maintainer decision.
>
> I agree, there can be n number of solution for a problem.
>
> Since you modelled system state signal (USB PWRRDY) as reset control signal, it is reset/DT maintainer's decision
> to say the final word whether this signal fits in reset system framework or not?
I was thinking:
1/ Geert would be the best to say if he considers it OK to handle this
in Linux
2/ if OK, then we should get approval from Ulf and Philipp on the power
domain or reset approaches
Thank you,
Claudiu Beznea
>
> Cheers,
> biju
Powered by blists - more mailing lists