| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20240903024753.104609-1-bagasdotme@gmail.com> Date: Tue, 3 Sep 2024 09:47:53 +0700 From: Bagas Sanjaya <bagasdotme@...il.com> To: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Linux Documentation <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>, Linux Kernel Livepatching <live-patching@...r.kernel.org> Cc: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...nel.org>, Jiri Kosina <jikos@...nel.org>, Miroslav Benes <mbenes@...e.cz>, Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>, Joe Lawrence <joe.lawrence@...hat.com>, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>, Marcos Paulo de Souza <mpdesouza@...e.com>, Bagas Sanjaya <bagasdotme@...il.com> Subject: [PATCH] Documentation: livepatch: Correct release locks antonym "get" doesn't properly fit as an antonym for "release" in the context of locking. Correct it with "acquire". Signed-off-by: Bagas Sanjaya <bagasdotme@...il.com> --- Documentation/livepatch/livepatch.rst | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/Documentation/livepatch/livepatch.rst b/Documentation/livepatch/livepatch.rst index 68e3651e8af925..acb90164929e32 100644 --- a/Documentation/livepatch/livepatch.rst +++ b/Documentation/livepatch/livepatch.rst @@ -50,7 +50,7 @@ some limitations, see below. 3. Consistency model ==================== -Functions are there for a reason. They take some input parameters, get or +Functions are there for a reason. They take some input parameters, acquire or release locks, read, process, and even write some data in a defined way, have return values. In other words, each function has a defined semantic. -- An old man doll... just what I always wanted! - Clara
Powered by blists - more mailing lists