[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <3ae3de70-0999-bf76-3da5-b1ef9d6a015a@huawei.com>
Date: Tue, 3 Sep 2024 20:22:17 +0800
From: "Leizhen (ThunderTown)" <thunder.leizhen@...wei.com>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, Andrew Morton
<akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] debugobjects: Fix the misuse of global variables in
fill_pool()
On 2024/9/3 19:43, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 03 2024 at 19:14, Leizhen wrote:
>> On 2024/9/3 17:37, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
>>> On Tue, Sep 03 2024 at 15:00, Leizhen wrote:
>>>>>> @@ -84,10 +85,7 @@ static int __data_racy debug_objects_fixups __read_mostly;
>>>>>> static int __data_racy debug_objects_warnings __read_mostly;
>>>>>> static int __data_racy debug_objects_enabled __read_mostly
>>>>>> = CONFIG_DEBUG_OBJECTS_ENABLE_DEFAULT;
>>>>>> -static int __data_racy debug_objects_pool_size __read_mostly
>>>>>> - = ODEBUG_POOL_SIZE;
>>>>>> -static int __data_racy debug_objects_pool_min_level __read_mostly
>>>>>> - = ODEBUG_POOL_MIN_LEVEL;
>>>>>> +static int __data_racy obj_pool_min_free = ODEBUG_POOL_SIZE;
>>>>
>>>> Sorry, I rechecked it again. After this patch, obj_pool_min_free is referenced in the
>>>> same way as obj_pool_max_used. The only race point is located in debug_stats_show().
>>>> However, this reference point does not need to be included in the race analysis. So
>>>> there is no need to add __data_racy for obj_pool_min_free.
>>>
>>> The read races against the write, so KCSAN can detect it and complain, no?
>>
>> Oh, I just saw that there were a lot of other global variables in that function
>> that didn't mask KCSAN's detection. So I'll recheck each global variable.
>> However, for obj_pool_min_free, it seems that it would be better to just add
>> READ_ONCE() in debug_stats_show(). This does not prevent the compiler from
>> optimizing variable references in the lock.
>>
>> # define __data_racy volatile
>
> This is only when KCSAN is enabled. Otherwise it's empty.
>
> And if you do a READ_ONCE() then you need a corresponding WRITE_ONCE()
> to make sense. __data_racy is much simpler for that.
OK, I will use __data_racy, thanks
>
> Thanks,
>
> tglx
> .
>
--
Regards,
Zhen Lei
Powered by blists - more mailing lists