[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZthX7bVSLYrlcey4@x1>
Date: Wed, 4 Sep 2024 09:51:57 -0300
From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>
To: Ian Rogers <irogers@...gle.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>,
Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>,
Kan Liang <kan.liang@...ux.intel.com>,
Athira Rajeev <atrajeev@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Dominique Martinet <asmadeus@...ewreck.org>,
Yang Jihong <yangjihong@...edance.com>,
Colin Ian King <colin.i.king@...il.com>,
Chaitanya S Prakash <chaitanyas.prakash@....com>,
"Masami Hiramatsu (Google)" <mhiramat@...nel.org>,
James Clark <james.clark@...aro.org>,
John Garry <john.g.garry@...cle.com>,
Junhao He <hejunhao3@...wei.com>, linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/6] Various 32-bit and test fixes
On Tue, Sep 03, 2024 at 10:06:00PM -0700, Ian Rogers wrote:
> The 4th and 5th cases fix the breakpoint length, on i386 so the
> sizeof(long) used matches the kernel's sizeof(long). On aarch64 the
> value is change to 4 instead of sizeof(long), ie 8, as future kernels
> may make 8 an invalid argument.
Applied these, the others were already in tmp.perf-tools-next, thanks.
- Arnaldo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists