linux-kernel - [PATCH 01/15] timers: Rename next_expiry

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20240904-devel-anna-maria-b4-timers-flseep-v1-1-e98760256370@linutronix.de>
Date: Wed, 04 Sep 2024 15:04:51 +0200
From: Anna-Maria Behnsen <anna-maria@...utronix.de>
To: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@...nel.org>, 
 Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Len Brown <len.brown@...el.com>, 
 "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>, 
 Anna-Maria Behnsen <anna-maria@...utronix.de>
Subject: [PATCH 01/15] timers: Rename next_expiry_recalc() to be unique

next_expiry_recalc is the name of a function as well as the name of a
struct member of struct timer_base. This might lead to confusion.

Rename next_expiry_recalc() to timer_recalc_next_expiry(). No functional
change.

Signed-off-by: Anna-Maria Behnsen <anna-maria@...utronix.de>
---
 kernel/time/timer.c | 6 +++---
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/time/timer.c b/kernel/time/timer.c
index 311ea459b976..5e021a2d8d61 100644
--- a/kernel/time/timer.c
+++ b/kernel/time/timer.c
@@ -1900,7 +1900,7 @@ static int next_pending_bucket(struct timer_base *base, unsigned offset,
  *
  * Store next expiry time in base->next_expiry.
  */
-static void next_expiry_recalc(struct timer_base *base)
+static void timer_recalc_next_expiry(struct timer_base *base)
 {
 	unsigned long clk, next, adj;
 	unsigned lvl, offset = 0;
@@ -2009,7 +2009,7 @@ static unsigned long next_timer_interrupt(struct timer_base *base,
 					  unsigned long basej)
 {
 	if (base->next_expiry_recalc)
-		next_expiry_recalc(base);
+		timer_recalc_next_expiry(base);

 	/*
 	 * Move next_expiry for the empty base into the future to prevent an
@@ -2413,7 +2413,7 @@ static inline void __run_timers(struct timer_base *base)
 		 * jiffies to avoid endless requeuing to current jiffies.
 		 */
 		base->clk++;
-		next_expiry_recalc(base);
+		timer_recalc_next_expiry(base);

 		while (levels--)
 			expire_timers(base, heads + levels);

-- 
2.39.2