[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1b79fb55-26d7-4966-9260-d3cdf3e0e8c8@icloud.com>
Date: Wed, 4 Sep 2024 22:26:39 +0800
From: Zijun Hu <zijun_hu@...oud.com>
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Zijun Hu <quic_zijuhu@...cinc.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] driver core: bus: Correct API bus_rescan_devices()
behavior
On 2024/9/4 21:54, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 04, 2024 at 08:56:44PM +0800, Zijun Hu wrote:
>> From: Zijun Hu <quic_zijuhu@...cinc.com>
>>
>> API bus_rescan_devices() should ideally scan drivers for a bus's devices
>> as many as possible, but it really stops scanning for remaining devices
>> even if a device encounters inconsequential errors such as -EPROBE_DEFER
>
> -EPROBE_DEFER should not be an issue for scanning the bus, that's only
> for probe errors, so who is returning that mess today? Let's fix that
> up please.
>
drivers/amba/bus.c:
struct bus_type amba_bustype = {
...
.match = amba_match,
...
};
amba_match() may return -EPROBE_DEFER.
you maybe also look at below AMBA bus related commit.
Commit: 656b8035b0ee ("ARM: 8524/1: driver cohandle -EPROBE_DEFER from
bus_type.match()"
is it proper to change bus_type match()'s return value type to bool type
back if this issue is fixed?
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
Powered by blists - more mailing lists