linux-kernel - Re: failed to remove key (0, ce:ce:1e:27:bb:e0) from hardware (-110) (ETIMEDOUT)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <87bk13jwzv.fsf@kernel.org>
Date: Wed, 04 Sep 2024 17:48:20 +0300
From: Kalle Valo <kvalo@...nel.org>
To: Paul Menzel <pmenzel@...gen.mpg.de>
Cc: Baochen Qiang <quic_bqiang@...cinc.com>,  James Prestwood
 <prestwoj@...il.com>,  linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org,
  ath10k@...ts.infradead.org,  LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: failed to remove key (0, ce:ce:1e:27:bb:e0) from hardware
 (-110) (ETIMEDOUT)

Paul Menzel <pmenzel@...gen.mpg.de> writes:

> Dear Linux folks,
>
>
> Linux 6.11-rc6+ logged the warning below when resuming from ACPI S3
> (or unloading and loading the `ath10k_core`/`ath10k_pci` modules)
> having been connected to an AVM network:
>
>     wlp58s0: failed to remove key (0, ce:ce:1e:27:bb:e0) from hardware
>     (-110)
>
> Error code 110 is the value for ETIMEDOUT. I saw James patch [1], and
> applied it, and the error is still there (as exepected).
>
> Can the warning be improved so the user know, which component is at fault?

The warning comes from mac80211 and it already contains your network
interface name (wlp58s0). What else would you want to see?

-- 
https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-wireless/list/

https://wireless.wiki.kernel.org/en/developers/documentation/submittingpatches
https://docs.kernel.org/process/submitting-patches.html