linux-kernel - [PATCH 1/2] perf/arm-cmn: Clean up unnecessary NUMA_NO

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <00634da33c21269a00844140afc7cc3a2ac1eb4d.1725474584.git.robin.murphy@arm.com>
Date: Wed,  4 Sep 2024 19:41:54 +0100
From: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>
To: will@...nel.org
Cc: mark.rutland@....com,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] perf/arm-cmn: Clean up unnecessary NUMA_NO_NODE check

Checking for NUMA_NO_NODE is a misleading and, on reflection, entirely
unnecessary micro-optimisation. If it ever did happen that an incoming
CPU has no NUMA affinity while the current CPU does, a questionably-
useful PMU migration isn't the biggest thing wrong with that picture...

Signed-off-by: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>
---

Just a couple more little tweaks here, paying back some co-development
from the NI driver.

 drivers/perf/arm-cmn.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/perf/arm-cmn.c b/drivers/perf/arm-cmn.c
index 0266ff041e0b..62d4782da7e4 100644
--- a/drivers/perf/arm-cmn.c
+++ b/drivers/perf/arm-cmn.c
@@ -2023,7 +2023,7 @@ static int arm_cmn_pmu_online_cpu(unsigned int cpu, struct hlist_node *cpuhp_nod
 
 	cmn = hlist_entry_safe(cpuhp_node, struct arm_cmn, cpuhp_node);
 	node = dev_to_node(cmn->dev);
-	if (node != NUMA_NO_NODE && cpu_to_node(cmn->cpu) != node && cpu_to_node(cpu) == node)
+	if (cpu_to_node(cmn->cpu) != node && cpu_to_node(cpu) == node)
 		arm_cmn_migrate(cmn, cpu);
 	return 0;
 }
-- 
2.39.2.101.g768bb238c484.dirty