linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 1/5] hwmon: (hp-wmi-sensors) Check if WMI event data exists

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <9c3139bf-b18f-4801-852e-08ac98611b1b@roeck-us.net>
Date: Wed, 4 Sep 2024 12:40:35 -0700
From: Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
To: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>, Armin Wolf <W_Armin@....de>
Cc: james@...iv.tech, jlee@...e.com, corentin.chary@...il.com,
 luke@...nes.dev, matan@...alib.org, coproscefalo@...il.com,
 ilpo.jarvinen@...ux.intel.com, jdelvare@...e.com, rafael@...nel.org,
 lenb@...nel.org, platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-hwmon@...r.kernel.org, linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/5] hwmon: (hp-wmi-sensors) Check if WMI event data
 exists

On 9/4/24 11:42, Hans de Goede wrote:
> Hi Guenter,
> 
> On 9/4/24 8:38 PM, Guenter Roeck wrote:
>> On 9/4/24 10:55, Hans de Goede wrote:
>>> Hi All,
>>>
>>> On 9/2/24 4:28 PM, Guenter Roeck wrote:
>>>> On Sun, Sep 01, 2024 at 05:10:51AM +0200, Armin Wolf wrote:
>>>>> The BIOS can choose to return no event data in response to a
>>>>> WMI event, so the ACPI object passed to the WMI notify handler
>>>>> can be NULL.
>>>>>
>>>>> Check for such a situation and ignore the event in such a case.
>>>>>
>>>>> Fixes: 23902f98f8d4 ("hwmon: add HP WMI Sensors driver")
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Armin Wolf <W_Armin@....de>
>>>>> Reviewed-by: Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@...ux.intel.com>
>>>>
>>>> Applied.
>>>
>>> Thank you.
>>>
>>> Unfortunately patch 2/5 touches the same part of the file,
>>> so I cannot apply the rest of the series without first
>>> bringing this patch into platform-drivers-x86/for-next .
>>>
>>> Guenter, can you provide an immutable branch/tag with
>>> this patch on it; or drop this patch that I merge
>>> the entire series through platform-drivers-x86/for-next ?
>>>
>>
>> Can you wait a couple of days ? Since this is a bug fix, I had
>> planned to send a pull request either later today or; with that,
>> the patch would be upstream.
> 
> Yes I can wait a couple of days, thank you.
> 

I sent a pull request, and the patch is already upstream.

Guenter