linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH net-next 0/3] selftests: mptcp: add time per subtests in TAP output

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <d91e6446-bdb1-4c22-a5c3-4c3f3dccebdb@kernel.org>
Date: Wed, 4 Sep 2024 22:41:15 +0200
From: Matthieu Baerts <matttbe@...nel.org>
To: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
Cc: mptcp@...ts.linux.dev, Mat Martineau <martineau@...nel.org>,
 Geliang Tang <geliang@...nel.org>, "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
 Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
 Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 0/3] selftests: mptcp: add time per subtests in
 TAP output

Hi Jakub,

Thank you for your reply!

On 04/09/2024 21:40, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> On Wed, 4 Sep 2024 18:15:09 +0200 Matthieu Baerts wrote:
>>> Best I could come up with is:
>>>
>>> diff --git a/contest/remote/vmksft-p.py b/contest/remote/vmksft-p.py
>>> index fe9e87abdb5c..a37245bd5b30 100755
>>> --- a/contest/remote/vmksft-p.py
>>> +++ b/contest/remote/vmksft-p.py
>>> @@ -73,7 +73,7 @@ group3 testV skip
>>>      tests = []
>>>      nested_tests = False
>>>  
>>> -    result_re = re.compile(r"(not )?ok (\d+)( -)? ([^#]*[^ ])( # )?([^ ].*)?$")
>>> +    result_re = re.compile(r"(not )?ok (\d+)( -)? ([^#]*[^ ])( +# )?([^ ].*)?$")  
>>
>> Looks good to me. While at it, we can add a '+' for the spaces after the
>> '#':
>>
>>   ( +# +)
> 
> 👍️
> 
>> I see you didn't commit the previous modification. I can open a PR if it
>> helps.
> 
> I was just playing with the regexps in the interpreter. If you could
> send a PR that'd perfect.

Sure, done:

  https://github.com/linux-netdev/nipa/pull/38

>>>      time_re = re.compile(r"time=(\d+)ms")
>>>  
>>>      for line in full_run.split('\n'):
>>>
>>> Thoughts?  
>>
>> In my v2, I will also strip these trailing whitespaces in the selftests,
>> they don't need to be there.
> 
> Up to you - it doesn't violate the KTAP format and the visual alignment
> is nice. But it may trip up more regexps..

Yes, better be safe... I will keep the visual alignment for the non-TAP
output.

Cheers,
Matt
-- 
Sponsored by the NGI0 Core fund.