lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20240904071424.lmonwdbq5clw7kb7@treble>
Date: Wed, 4 Sep 2024 00:14:24 -0700
From: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...nel.org>
To: zhang warden <zhangwarden@...il.com>
Cc: Miroslav Benes <mbenes@...e.cz>, Jiri Kosina <jikos@...nel.org>,
	Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>,
	Joe Lawrence <joe.lawrence@...hat.com>,
	live-patching@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/2] livepatch: Add using attribute to klp_func for
 using function show

On Wed, Sep 04, 2024 at 02:34:44PM +0800, zhang warden wrote:
> In the scenario where multiple people work together to maintain the
> same system, or a long time running system, the patch sets will
> inevitably be cumulative. I think kernel can maintain and tell user
> this most accurate information by one sysfs interface.

If there are multiple people applying patches independently from each
other (to the same function even!), you are playing with fire, as there
could easily be implicit dependencies and conflicts between the patches.

-- 
Josh

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ