[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2024090459-second-vaporizer-eecf@gregkh>
Date: Wed, 4 Sep 2024 11:46:14 +0200
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju@...aro.org>
Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org, patches@...ts.linux.dev,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux@...ck-us.net, shuah@...nel.org,
patches@...nelci.org, lkft-triage@...ts.linaro.org, pavel@...x.de,
jonathanh@...dia.com, f.fainelli@...il.com,
sudipm.mukherjee@...il.com, srw@...dewatkins.net, rwarsow@....de,
conor@...nel.org, allen.lkml@...il.com, broonie@...nel.org,
Anders Roxell <anders.roxell@...aro.org>,
aleksander.lobakin@...el.com,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4.19 00/98] 4.19.321-rc1 review
On Wed, Sep 04, 2024 at 11:38:05AM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 02, 2024 at 02:30:57PM +0530, Naresh Kamboju wrote:
> > On Sun, 1 Sept 2024 at 21:50, Greg Kroah-Hartman
> > <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> wrote:
> > >
> > > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.19.321 release.
> > > There are 98 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> > > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> > > let me know.
> > >
> > > Responses should be made by Tue, 03 Sep 2024 16:07:34 +0000.
> > > Anything received after that time might be too late.
> > >
> > > The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> > > https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v4.x/stable-review/patch-4.19.321-rc1.gz
> > > or in the git tree and branch at:
> > > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-4.19.y
> > > and the diffstat can be found below.
> > >
> > > thanks,
> > >
> > > greg k-h
> >
> > Apart from Powerpc build regressions we have noticed s390 build regression.
> > The S390 defconfig builds failed on Linux stable-rc 4.19.321-rc1 due to
> > following build warnings / errors with clang-18 and gcc-12.
> >
> > This is a same problem on current stable-rc review on
> > - 4.19.321-rc1 review
> >
> > In the case of stable-rc linux-4.19.y
> >
> > Reported-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing <lkft@...aro.org>
> >
> > Following two commits have been added on 4.19.321-rc1.
> > -------
> > s390/cio: rename bitmap_size() -> idset_bitmap_size()
> > commit c1023f5634b9bfcbfff0dc200245309e3cde9b54 upstream.
> >
> > bitmap: introduce generic optimized bitmap_size()
> > commit a37fbe666c016fd89e4460d0ebfcea05baba46dc upstream.
>
> Odd, this should have also shown up in your 5.4.y builds too.
>
> I'll go drop this from both trees now, thanks.
Nope, I need it there, I'll go add some helper functions to make this
work, thanks.
greg k-h
Powered by blists - more mailing lists