linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] static_call: Handle module init failure correctly in static_call_del

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <ffc4e9b0-3e67-9215-9168-91b2b3c68d5f@huawei.com>
Date: Wed, 4 Sep 2024 17:50:48 +0800
From: Jinjie Ruan <ruanjinjie@...wei.com>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"Peter Zijlstra (Intel)" <peterz@...radead.org>, Christophe Leroy
	<christophe.leroy@...roup.eu>, Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] static_call: Handle module init failure correctly in
 static_call_del_module()



On 2024/9/4 16:51, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 04 2024 at 16:03, Jinjie Ruan wrote:
>> On 2024/9/4 15:08, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
>>> So the check must be:
>>>
>>> 	if (!static_call_key_has_mods(key))
>>>         	break;
>>
>> Hi, Thomas,
>>
>> with this patch, the issue not occurs again，
>>
>> but there are some memory leak here same to the following problem:
> 
> That has absolutely nothing to do with static calls and the memory
> allocation failure case there.
> 
> The module passed all preparatory steps, otherwise it would not be able
> to create a kmem_cache from the module init() function:
> 
>      kmem_cache_create+0x11/0x20
>      do_one_initcall+0xdc/0x550
>      do_init_module+0x241/0x630
> 
> amdgpu_init()
> 
> 	r = amdgpu_sync_init();
> 	if (r)
> 		goto error_sync;
> 
> 	r = amdgpu_fence_slab_init();
> 	if (r)
> 		goto error_fence;
> 
>         <SNIP>
>         
> 	return pci_register_driver(&amdgpu_kms_pci_driver);
> 
> error_fence:
> 	amdgpu_sync_fini();
> error_sync:
>         return r;
> 
> Can you spot the problem?

I see, let me test it.

> 
> Thanks,
> 
>         tglx