[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <bbe54c4e-dd0c-488c-bffd-f9dddf6b13f8@sirena.org.uk>
Date: Wed, 4 Sep 2024 12:30:28 +0100
From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+huawei@...nel.org>
Cc: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
Konstantin Ryabitsev <konstantin@...uxfoundation.org>,
workflows@...r.kernel.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] docs: submitting-patches: Advertise b4
On Wed, Sep 04, 2024 at 04:44:51AM +0200, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
> Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org> escreveu:
> > +Tooling
> > +-------
> > +Many of the technical aspects of this process can be automated using
> > +b4, documented at <https://b4.docs.kernel.org/en/latest/>. This can
> > +help with things like tracking dependencies, running checkpatch and
> > +with formatting and sending mails.
> > +
> > +
> No need for two blank lines (yeah, there's a mix on this file of using
> one or two blank lines for paragraphs).
I have to say that the double lines between sections do help with
native readability of the document.
> I would also add quick example(s) on how to use it for common workflows.
The b4 documentation is already pretty good and the submitter side is
focused on a single task so it's much easier for people to navigate
than something like git where there's a lot of flexibility, I'm not sure
rewriting an abbreviated version is a great idea. Someone with a better
idea of what would be useful could always follow up and add that.
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists