[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87a5gntzd5.fsf@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 04 Sep 2024 13:47:02 +0200
From: Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>
To: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>
Cc: Yan Zhao <yan.y.zhao@...el.com>, Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@...hat.com>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
rcu@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Kevin Tian
<kevin.tian@...el.com>, Yiwei Zhang <zzyiwei@...gle.com>, Lai Jiangshan
<jiangshanlai@...il.com>, "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>, Josh
Triplett <josh@...htriplett.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/5] KVM: VMX: Always honor guest PAT on CPUs that
support self-snoop
Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com> writes:
> Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com> writes:
>
>> On Mon, Sep 02, 2024, Vitaly Kuznetsov wrote:
>>> FWIW, I use QEMU-9.0 from the same C10S (qemu-kvm-9.0.0-7.el10.x86_64)
>>> but I don't think it matters in this case. My CPU is "Intel(R) Xeon(R)
>>> Silver 4410Y".
>>
>> Has this been reproduced on any other hardware besides SPR? I.e. did we stumble
>> on another hardware issue?
>
> Very possible, as according to Yan Zhao this doesn't reproduce on at
> least "Coffee Lake-S". Let me try to grab some random hardware around
> and I'll be back with my observations.
We have some interesting results :-)
In addition to Sapphire Rapids, the issue also reproduces on a Cascade
lake CPU (Intel(R) Xeon(R) Silver 4214 CPU) but does NOT reproduce on
Skylake (Intel(R) Xeon(R) Gold 5118 CPU). I don't have a lot of desktop
CPUs around, so can't say much.
AMD also doesn't seem to be affected, at leats AMD EPYC 7413 works fine.
--
Vitaly
Powered by blists - more mailing lists