[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <b5b0e655-fb17-4967-9104-4386710ee8db@acm.org>
Date: Tue, 3 Sep 2024 19:28:42 -0700
From: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@....org>
To: Yu Kuai <yukuai1@...weicloud.com>, Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>,
jack@...e.cz, tj@...nel.org, josef@...icpanda.com, paolo.valente@...more.it,
mauro.andreolini@...more.it, avanzini.arianna@...il.com
Cc: cgroups@...r.kernel.org, linux-block@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, yi.zhang@...wei.com, yangerkun@...wei.com,
"yukuai (C)" <yukuai3@...wei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH for-6.12 0/4] block, bfq: fix corner cases related to bfqq
merging
On 9/3/24 6:32 PM, Yu Kuai wrote:
> We do have customers are using bfq in downstream kernels, and we are
> still running lots of test for bfq.
It may take less time to add any missing functionality to another I/O
scheduler rather than to keep maintaining BFQ.
If Android device vendors would stop using BFQ, my job would become
easier.
Thanks,
Bart.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists