[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <f8c12aed-b5d1-4522-bf95-622b8569706d@stanley.mountain>
Date: Thu, 5 Sep 2024 16:17:06 +0300
From: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...aro.org>
To: Jens Wiklander <jens.wiklander@...aro.org>
Cc: Sumit Garg <sumit.garg@...aro.org>,
Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>,
op-tee@...ts.trustedfirmware.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH next] optee: Fix a NULL vs IS_ERR() check
The tee_shm_get_va() function never returns NULL, it returns error
pointers. Update the check to match.
Fixes: f0c8431568ee ("optee: probe RPMB device using RPMB subsystem")
Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...aro.org>
---
drivers/tee/optee/rpc.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/tee/optee/rpc.c b/drivers/tee/optee/rpc.c
index a4b49fd1d46d..ebbbd42b0e3e 100644
--- a/drivers/tee/optee/rpc.c
+++ b/drivers/tee/optee/rpc.c
@@ -332,7 +332,7 @@ static void handle_rpc_func_rpmb_probe_next(struct tee_context *ctx,
}
buf = tee_shm_get_va(params[1].u.memref.shm,
params[1].u.memref.shm_offs);
- if (!buf) {
+ if (IS_ERR(buf)) {
arg->ret = TEEC_ERROR_BAD_PARAMETERS;
return;
}
--
2.45.2
Powered by blists - more mailing lists