[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87tteu6c01.fsf@yhuang6-desk2.ccr.corp.intel.com>
Date: Thu, 05 Sep 2024 11:00:14 +0800
From: "Huang, Ying" <ying.huang@...el.com>
To: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-cxl@...r.kernel.org>, Dan
Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>, David Hildenbrand
<david@...hat.com>, "Davidlohr Bueso" <dave@...olabs.net>, Jonathan
Cameron <jonathan.cameron@...wei.com>, Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@...el.com>,
Alison Schofield <alison.schofield@...el.com>, Vishal Verma
<vishal.l.verma@...el.com>, "Ira Weiny" <ira.weiny@...el.com>, Alistair
Popple <apopple@...dia.com>, "Bjorn Helgaas" <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
Baoquan He <bhe@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -v2] Resource: fix region_intersects() for CXL memory
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com> writes:
> On Wed, Sep 04, 2024 at 03:48:44PM +0800, Huang, Ying wrote:
>> Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com> writes:
>> > On Mon, Aug 19, 2024 at 10:34:13AM +0800, Huang Ying wrote:
>
[snip]
>
>> >> + ostart = max(res.start, p->start);
>> >> + oend = min(res.end, p->end);
>> >
>> > Isn't a reinvention of resource_intersection()? With that in place you may also
>> > drop the above resource_overlaps().
>>
>> sizeof(struct resource) == 8 * sizeof(unsigned long)
>>
>> Just want to avoid to define another struct resource on stack.
>
> Is it a problem?
Not a serious problem. Just prefer to avoid too much stack usage.
IMHO, the benefit isn't large too.
--
Best Regards,
Huang, Ying
Powered by blists - more mailing lists