linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH net-next 0/2] net: xilinx: axienet: Enable adaptive IRQ coalescing with DIM

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <d2470924-78a2-4905-a24f-afb127644d70@linux.dev>
Date: Thu, 5 Sep 2024 10:27:00 -0400
From: Sean Anderson <sean.anderson@...ux.dev>
To: Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
 Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
 Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
 Radhey Shyam Pandey <radhey.shyam.pandey@....com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
 Michal Simek <michal.simek@....com>, Heng Qi <hengqi@...ux.alibaba.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 0/2] net: xilinx: axienet: Enable adaptive IRQ
 coalescing with DIM

On 9/4/24 12:35, Simon Horman wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 03, 2024 at 03:25:22PM -0400, Sean Anderson wrote:
>> To improve performance without sacrificing latency under low load,
>> enable DIM. While I appreciate not having to write the library myself, I
>> do think there are many unusual aspects to DIM, as detailed in the last
>> patch.
>> 
>> This series depends on [1].
>> 
>> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20240903180059.4134461-1-sean.anderson@linux.dev/
> 
> Hi Sean,
> 
> Unfortunately the CI doesn't understand dependencies,
> and so it is unable to apply this patchset :(
> 
> I would suggest bundling patches for the same driver for net-next
> in a single patchset. And in any case, only having one active
> at any given time.
> 

Well, I would normally do so, but that patch is a fix and this series is
an improvement. So that one goes into net and this one goes into net-next.

I've been advised in the past to split up independent patches so they can be
reviewed/applied individually.

--Sean