[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZtnJQdu2V2DPmT8R@lizhi-Precision-Tower-5810>
Date: Thu, 5 Sep 2024 11:07:45 -0400
From: Frank Li <Frank.li@....com>
To: Mukesh Kumar Savaliya <quic_msavaliy@...cinc.com>
Cc: Ravindra Yashvant Shinde <ravindra.yashvant.shinde@....com>,
Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com>,
"moderated list:I3C SUBSYSTEM" <linux-i3c@...ts.infradead.org>,
open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, imx@...ts.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/1] i3c: master: Avoid sending DISEC command with old
device address.
On Thu, Sep 05, 2024 at 03:25:09PM +0530, Mukesh Kumar Savaliya wrote:
> Hi Ravindra,
>
>
> On 8/20/2024 8:49 PM, Ravindra Yashvant Shinde wrote:
> > When a new device hotjoins, a new dynamic address is assigned.
> > i3c_master_add_i3c_dev_locked() identifies that the device was previously
> > attached to the bus and locates the olddev.
> >
> After 2-3 reads i could understand what exactly you are trying.
> Could you please keep the complete commit log here ?
>
> "
> The olddev should not receive any commands on the i3c bus as it
> does not exist and has been assigned a new address. This will
> result in NACK or timeout. So, update the olddev->ibi->enabled
> flag to false to avoid DISEC with OldAddr.
> "
>
> Make a complete story here, you don't need function to be added here since
> description should make it clear to understand.
This one is only partial fix this problem. I merged it into
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-i3c/20240829-i3c_fix-v4-1-ebcbd5efceba@nxp.com/T/#u
This one is full fix.
Frank
>
> > i3c_master_add_i3c_dev_locked()
> > {
> > ...
> > olddev = i3c_master_search_i3c_dev_duplicate(newdev);
> > ...
> > if (olddev) {
> > enable_ibi = true;
> > ...
> > }
> > i3c_dev_free_ibi_locked(olddev);
> > ^^^^^^^^
> > This function internally calls i3c_dev_disable_ibi_locked(addr)
> > function causing to send DISEC command with old Address.
> >
> > The olddev should not receive any commands on the i3c bus as it
> > does not exist and has been assigned a new address. This will
> Isn't this the same device who raised HOTJOIN and seeking a new dynamic
> address ? you intend to have no communication with older device address
> right ?
> > result in NACK or timeout. So, update the olddev->ibi->enabled
> > flag to false to avoid DISEC with OldAddr.
> > ...
> > }
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Ravindra Yashvant Shinde <ravindra.yashvant.shinde@....com>
> > ---
> > change from v1 to v2
> > - Fixed the author name.
> > - Unconditional set to the false & added some comments.
> > ---
> > drivers/i3c/master.c | 9 ++++++++-
> > 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/i3c/master.c b/drivers/i3c/master.c
> > index 7028f03c2c42..0dd8d1c28d58 100644
> > --- a/drivers/i3c/master.c
> > +++ b/drivers/i3c/master.c
> > @@ -2043,7 +2043,14 @@ int i3c_master_add_i3c_dev_locked(struct i3c_master_controller *master,
> > enable_ibi = true;
> > i3c_dev_disable_ibi_locked(olddev);
> > }
> > -
> > + /*
> > + * The olddev should not receive any commands on the
> > + * i3c bus as it does not exist and has been assigned
> > + * a new address. This will result in NACK or timeout.
> > + * So, update the olddev->ibi->enabled flag to false
> > + * to avoid DISEC with OldAddr.
> > + */
> > + olddev->ibi->enabled = false;
> > i3c_dev_free_ibi_locked(olddev);
> > }
> > mutex_unlock(&olddev->ibi_lock);
Powered by blists - more mailing lists