linux-kernel - Re: [syzbot] [net?] KASAN: slab-use-after-free Read in unix_stream_read

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20240905210349.29835-1-kuniyu@amazon.com>
Date: Thu, 5 Sep 2024 14:03:49 -0700
From: Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@...zon.com>
To: <rao.shoaib@...cle.com>
CC: <davem@...emloft.net>, <edumazet@...gle.com>, <kuba@...nel.org>,
	<kuniyu@...zon.com>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	<netdev@...r.kernel.org>, <pabeni@...hat.com>,
	<syzbot+8811381d455e3e9ec788@...kaller.appspotmail.com>,
	<syzkaller-bugs@...glegroups.com>
Subject: Re: [syzbot] [net?] KASAN: slab-use-after-free Read in unix_stream_read_actor (2)

From: Shoaib Rao <rao.shoaib@...cle.com>
Date: Thu, 5 Sep 2024 13:48:16 -0700
> On 9/5/2024 1:35 PM, Kuniyuki Iwashima wrote:
> > From: Shoaib Rao <rao.shoaib@...cle.com>
> > Date: Thu, 5 Sep 2024 13:15:18 -0700
> >> On 9/5/2024 12:46 PM, Kuniyuki Iwashima wrote:
> >>> From: Shoaib Rao <rao.shoaib@...cle.com>
> >>> Date: Thu, 5 Sep 2024 00:35:35 -0700
> >>>> Hi All,
> >>>>
> >>>> I am not able to reproduce the issue. I have run the C program at least
> >>>> 100 times in a loop. In the I do get an EFAULT, not sure if that is
> >>>> intentional or not but no panic. Should I be doing something
> >>>> differently? The kernel version I am using is
> >>>> v6.11-rc6-70-gc763c4339688. Later I can try with the exact version.
> >>> The -EFAULT is the bug meaning that we were trying to read an consumed skb.
> >>>
> >>> But the first bug is in recvfrom() that shouldn't be able to read OOB skb
> >>> without MSG_OOB, which doesn't clear unix_sk(sk)->oob_skb, and later
> >>> something bad happens.
> >>>
> >>>     socketpair(AF_UNIX, SOCK_STREAM, 0, [3, 4]) = 0
> >>>     sendmsg(4, {msg_name=NULL, msg_namelen=0, msg_iov=[{iov_base="\333", iov_len=1}], msg_iovlen=1, msg_controllen=0, msg_flags=0}, MSG_OOB|MSG_DONTWAIT) = 1
> >>>     recvmsg(3, {msg_name=NULL, msg_namelen=0, msg_iov=NULL, msg_iovlen=0, msg_controllen=0, msg_flags=MSG_OOB}, MSG_OOB|MSG_WAITFORONE) = 1
> >>>     sendmsg(4, {msg_name=NULL, msg_namelen=0, msg_iov=[{iov_base="\21", iov_len=1}], msg_iovlen=1, msg_controllen=0, msg_flags=0}, MSG_OOB|MSG_NOSIGNAL|MSG_MORE) = 1
> >>>> recvfrom(3, "\21", 125, MSG_DONTROUTE|MSG_TRUNC|MSG_DONTWAIT, NULL, NULL) = 1
> >>>     recvmsg(3, {msg_namelen=0}, MSG_OOB|MSG_ERRQUEUE) = -1 EFAULT (Bad address)
> >>>
> >>> I posted a fix officially:
> >>> https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20240905193240.17565-5-kuniyu@amazon.com/__;!!ACWV5N9M2RV99hQ!IJeFvLdaXIRN2ABsMFVaKOEjI3oZb2kUr6ld6ZRJCPAVum4vuyyYwUP6_5ZH9mGZiJDn6vrbxBAOqYI$
> >> Thanks that is great. Isn't EFAULT,  normally indicative of an issue
> >> with the user provided address of the buffer, not the kernel buffer.
> > Normally, it's used when copy_to_user() or copy_from_user() or
> > something similar failed.
> >
> > But this time, if you turn KASAN off, you'll see the last recvmsg()
> > returns 1-byte garbage instead of -EFAULT, so actually KASAN worked
> > on your host, I guess.
> 
> No it did not work. As soon as KASAN detected read after free it should 
> have paniced as it did in the report and I have been running the 
> syzbot's C program in a continuous loop. I would like to reproduce the 
> issue before we can accept the fix -- If that is alright with you. I 
> will try your new test case later and report back. Thanks for the patch 
> though.

The splat is handy, you may want to check the returned value of recvfrom()
with KASAN on and off and then focus on the root cause.  When UAF happens,
the real bug always happens before that.

FWIW, I was able to see the splat on my setup and it disappeared with
my patch.  Also, syzbot has already tested the equivalent change.
https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/00000000000064fbcb06215a7bbc@google.com/