linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v6 1/2] dt-bindings: display: Add Sharp Memory LCD bindings

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <w6izw3nv35zhquqipv5elp7hqf5pdtu6b2ss2infh4mmxr4aop@cxypawy5rufr>
Date: Thu, 5 Sep 2024 18:31:35 -0400
From: Alex Lanzano <lanzano.alex@...il.com>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
Cc: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@...ux.intel.com>, 
	Maxime Ripard <mripard@...nel.org>, Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@...e.de>, 
	David Airlie <airlied@...il.com>, Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, 
	Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>, Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, 
	Uwe Kleine-König <ukleinek@...nel.org>, Mehdi Djait <mehdi.djait@...tlin.com>, 
	christophe.jaillet@...adoo.fr, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org, 
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-pwm@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 1/2] dt-bindings: display: Add Sharp Memory LCD
 bindings

On Thu, Sep 05, 2024 at 11:12:47PM GMT, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 05/09/2024 22:27, Alex Lanzano wrote:
> > On Thu, Sep 05, 2024 at 03:23:20PM GMT, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> >> On 05/09/2024 14:43, Alex Lanzano wrote:
> >>> Add device tree bindings for the monochrome Sharp Memory LCD
> >>>
> >>> Co-developed-by: Mehdi Djait <mehdi.djait@...tlin.com>
> >>> Signed-off-by: Mehdi Djait <mehdi.djait@...tlin.com>
> >>> Signed-off-by: Alex Lanzano <lanzano.alex@...il.com>
> >>
> >> I don't understand what happened here. Your process of handling patches
> >> is odd. Tags do not disappear, you had to remove them, right? So where
> >> is the explanation for this?
> > 
> > Whoops! My apologies for wasting time. Nothing changed in this patch
> > I forgot to add in your reviewed-by tag.
> 
> Tag was there before, so you removed it...

In prior versions I was manually adding the tag to the patch file. But I
have since added it to the commit message like I should have from the
beginning. Again, I apologize for any time wasted and appreciate the
review.