lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAK7LNASt2eP6q46YP0hCN=f5frt5r5qmwj25tiYrxjwOmGOwEg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 6 Sep 2024 08:58:15 +0900
From: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@...nel.org>
To: Daniel Gomez <da.gomez@...sung.com>
Cc: Nicolas Schier <nicolas@...sle.eu>, Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>, 
	Nathan Chancellor <nathan@...nel.org>, Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@...el.com>, 
	Thomas Hellström <thomas.hellstrom@...ux.intel.com>, 
	Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@...el.com>, 
	Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@...ux.intel.com>, Maxime Ripard <mripard@...nel.org>, 
	Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@...e.de>, David Airlie <airlied@...il.com>, Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>, 
	William Hubbs <w.d.hubbs@...il.com>, Chris Brannon <chris@...-brannons.com>, 
	Kirk Reiser <kirk@...sers.ca>, Samuel Thibault <samuel.thibault@...-lyon.org>, 
	Paul Moore <paul@...l-moore.com>, Stephen Smalley <stephen.smalley.work@...il.com>, 
	Ondrej Mosnacek <omosnace@...hat.com>, Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>, 
	Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>, Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>, Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@...ux.dev>, 
	James Morse <james.morse@....com>, Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@....com>, 
	Zenghui Yu <yuzenghui@...wei.com>, Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@...nel.org>, 
	Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>, Bill Wendling <morbo@...gle.com>, 
	Justin Stitt <justinstitt@...gle.com>, 
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, 
	"linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org>, 
	"intel-xe@...ts.freedesktop.org" <intel-xe@...ts.freedesktop.org>, 
	"dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org" <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>, 
	"speakup@...ux-speakup.org" <speakup@...ux-speakup.org>, 
	"selinux@...r.kernel.org" <selinux@...r.kernel.org>, 
	"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>, 
	"kvmarm@...ts.linux.dev" <kvmarm@...ts.linux.dev>, 
	"linux-serial@...r.kernel.org" <linux-serial@...r.kernel.org>, 
	"llvm@...ts.linux.dev" <llvm@...ts.linux.dev>, Finn Behrens <me@...enk.dev>, 
	"Daniel Gomez (Samsung)" <d+samsung@...ces.com>, "gost.dev@...sung.com" <gost.dev@...sung.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 08/12] include: add elf.h support

On Thu, Sep 5, 2024 at 5:56 PM Daniel Gomez <da.gomez@...sung.com> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Sep 02, 2024 at 01:15:01AM +0900, Masahiro Yamada wrote:
> > On Sat, Aug 31, 2024 at 4:54 AM Nicolas Schier <nicolas@...sle.eu> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Sat, Aug 24, 2024 at 12:54:50AM +0200 Daniel Gomez wrote:
> > > > On Wed, Aug 07, 2024 at 05:46:03PM +0200, Nicolas Schier wrote:
> > > > > On Wed, Aug 07, 2024 at 04:18:54PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > > > > > On Wed, Aug 07, 2024 at 02:13:57PM +0000, Daniel Gomez wrote:
> > > > > > > > Also, as this is not internal for the kernel, but rather for userspace
> > > > > > > > builds, shouldn't the include/ path be different?
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Can you suggest an alternative path or provide documentation that could help
> > > > > > > identify the correct location? Perhaps usr/include?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > That is better than the generic include path as you are attempting to
> > > > > > mix userspace and kernel headers in the same directory :(
> > > > >
> > > > > Please keep in mind, that usr/include/ currently does not hold a single
> > > > > header file but is used for dynamically composing the UAPI header tree.
> > > > >
> > > > > In general, I do not like the idea of keeping a elf.h file here that
> > > > > possibly is out-of-sync with the actual system's version (even though
> > > > > elf.h should not see that much changes).  Might it be more helpful to
> > > > > provide a "development kit" for Linux devs that need to build on MacOS
> > > > > that provides necessary missing system header files, instead of merging
> > > > > those into upstream?
> > > >
> > > > I took this suggestion and tried pushing a Homebrew formula/package here [1].
> > > > I think I chose a wrong name and maybe something like "development kit" would
> > > > have been better. However, would it be possible instead to include the *.rb file
> > > > in the scripts/ directory? So users of this can generate the development kit in
> > > > their environments. I would maintain the script to keep it in sync with the
> > > > required glibc version for the latest kernel version.
> > > >
> > > > [1] https://protect2.fireeye.com/v1/url?k=96027706-f7896236-9603fc49-000babffaa23-452f645d7a72e234&q=1&e=343dd31c-5e5b-4b09-8ee5-6c59a1ff826e&u=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2FHomebrew%2Fhomebrew-core%2Fpull%2F181885
> > >
> > > I think it sounds sensible to hold that formula file in the upstream tree.  But
> > > I am not sure if scripts/ is the best location.
> > >
> > > Masahiro, what do you think?
> >
> >
> > I do not know much about the homebrew, but why does the upstream
> > kernel need to merge such masOS stuff?
>
> The missing headers (in macOS) need to be provided somehow. One way can be
> having the formula (*.rb file) in-tree, so users of this can install them in
> their systems. This would also require to have a tarball with the missing
> headers either in-tree or somewhere accessible so it can be fetched.
>
> To avoid having the formula and a tarball in-tree, I've created a Homebrew Tap
> (3rd-Party Repository) called 'Bee Headers Project' [1][2][3] that can provision
> the missing headers. The project provides a bee-headers package and formula
> that will install byteswap.h, elf.h and endian.h in the user's system Hombrew
> directory. It also provides a *.pc file so pkg-config can be used to find the
> location of these headers. I have a v2 with this solution ready, perhaps is
> easier to discuss this with the code.


It is up to you what project you start in Github.

Then, what do you need to submit v2 for this?





>
> I think we can extend the same package and include extra headers if we need
> more in the future. I see for x86_64 asm/types.h and others might be required.
> The bee-headers package can then be the repository to place and distribute them.
>
> Please, let me know if you think of an alternative solution, I can give a try
> and explore.
>
> [1] Project:
> https://github.com/bee-headers
> [2] Headers repository:
> https://github.com/bee-headers/headers.git
> [3] Homebrew Tap formula:
> https://github.com/bee-headers/homebrew-bee-headers.git
>
>
> >
> >
> >
> > >
> > > Kind regards,
> > > Nicolas
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Best Regards
> > Masahiro Yamada



-- 
Best Regards
Masahiro Yamada

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ