linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 02/19] remoteproc: qcom: pas: Add QCS8300 remoteproc support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <a0f3176d-9b2a-4fb9-9a7b-f8e778e3b427@quicinc.com>
Date: Thu, 5 Sep 2024 12:30:54 +0800
From: Jingyi Wang <quic_jingyw@...cinc.com>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>,
        Bjorn Andersson
	<andersson@...nel.org>,
        Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@...aro.org>,
        "Rob
 Herring" <robh@...nel.org>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
        "Conor
 Dooley" <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
        Bartosz Golaszewski
	<bartosz.golaszewski@...aro.org>
CC: <linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-remoteproc@...r.kernel.org>,
        <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        Xin Liu
	<quic_liuxin@...cinc.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/19] remoteproc: qcom: pas: Add QCS8300 remoteproc
 support



On 9/4/2024 5:36 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 04/09/2024 10:33, Jingyi Wang wrote:
>> Add support for PIL loading on ADSP, CDSP and GPDSP on QCS8300
>> platform.
>>
>> Co-developed-by: Xin Liu <quic_liuxin@...cinc.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Xin Liu <quic_liuxin@...cinc.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Jingyi Wang <quic_jingyw@...cinc.com>
>> ---
>>  drivers/remoteproc/qcom_q6v5_pas.c | 3 +++
>>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/qcom_q6v5_pas.c b/drivers/remoteproc/qcom_q6v5_pas.c
>> index ef82835e98a4..f92ccd4921b7 100644
>> --- a/drivers/remoteproc/qcom_q6v5_pas.c
>> +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/qcom_q6v5_pas.c
>> @@ -1416,6 +1416,9 @@ static const struct of_device_id adsp_of_match[] = {
>>  	{ .compatible = "qcom,qcs404-adsp-pas", .data = &adsp_resource_init },
>>  	{ .compatible = "qcom,qcs404-cdsp-pas", .data = &cdsp_resource_init },
>>  	{ .compatible = "qcom,qcs404-wcss-pas", .data = &wcss_resource_init },
>> +	{ .compatible = "qcom,qcs8300-adsp-pas", .data = &sa8775p_adsp_resource},
>> +	{ .compatible = "qcom,qcs8300-cdsp-pas", .data = &sa8775p_cdsp0_resource},
>> +	{ .compatible = "qcom,qcs8300-gpdsp-pas", .data = &sa8775p_gpdsp0_resource},
> 
> What's the point of this? You have entire commit msg to explain such
> weird duplication. Otherwise sorry, don't duplicate unnecessarily.
> Devices are compatible, aren't they?
> 
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof
> 
> 
I will drop this, could you please help us to understand what is the correct way to
deal such situation, do we need to update the yaml and add qcs8300 bindings or just
reference to sa8775p bindings in the device tree?

Thanks,
Jingyi