linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v1 1/4] dt-bindindgs: i2c: qcom,i2c-geni: Document shared flag

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <dc434cb2-7eb0-48fc-967f-5ed93ad1284c@quicinc.com>
Date: Thu, 5 Sep 2024 11:13:45 +0530
From: Mukesh Kumar Savaliya <quic_msavaliy@...cinc.com>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>, <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>,
        <andersson@...nel.org>, <andi.shyti@...nel.org>,
        <linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>, <dmaengine@...r.kernel.org>,
        <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org>
CC: <quic_vdadhani@...cinc.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/4] dt-bindindgs: i2c: qcom,i2c-geni: Document shared
 flag



On 9/4/2024 11:50 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 04/09/2024 20:12, Mukesh Kumar Savaliya wrote:
>>> Tools like b4 or scripts/get_maintainer.pl provide you proper list of
>>> people, so fix your workflow. Tools might also fail if you work on some
>>> ancient tree (don't, instead use mainline) or work on fork of kernel
>>> (don't, instead use mainline). Just use b4 and everything should be
>>> fine, although remember about `b4 prep --auto-to-cc` if you added new
>>> patches to the patchset.
>>>
>>> You missed at least devicetree list (maybe more), so this won't be
>>> tested by automated tooling. Performing review on untested code might be
>>> a waste of time.
>>>
>>
>> You mean flag addition into DTSI file ? If yes, then the intention was
>> to just enable feature support but not into mainline because it should
>> happen per board or usecase. Please suggest if i can enable particular
>> node with DTSI feature flag.
>> Please correct me if my understanding on your ask went wrong.
> 
> How is this related?
"You missed at least devicetree list (maybe more)" - Do you mean to say 
i missed to add DTSI changes OR maintainers for DTSI ? seeking clarity 
to avoid confusion.
> 
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof
> 
>