[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <25f5e650-5471-49eb-9518-49668e0e9e93@kernel.org>
Date: Thu, 5 Sep 2024 08:26:34 +0200
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
To: Jingyi Wang <quic_jingyw@...cinc.com>,
Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@...aro.org>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>, Conor Dooley
<conor+dt@...nel.org>, Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@...aro.org>
Cc: linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-remoteproc@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 16/19] dt-bindings: arm: qcom: document QCS8275/QCS8300
SoC and reference board
On 05/09/2024 06:42, Jingyi Wang wrote:
>
>
> On 9/4/2024 5:38 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> On 04/09/2024 10:33, Jingyi Wang wrote:
>>> Document the QCS8275/QCS8300 SoC and its reference board QCS8300 RIDE.
>>> QCS8300 is an Industrial Safe SoC, while QCS8275 is the Industrial
>>> Non-Safe version which can share the same SoC dtsi and board DTS.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Jingyi Wang <quic_jingyw@...cinc.com>
>>> ---
>>> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/qcom.yaml | 8 ++++++++
>>> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/qcom.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/qcom.yaml
>>> index c0529486810f..ccf9a166368f 100644
>>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/qcom.yaml
>>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/qcom.yaml
>>> @@ -42,6 +42,8 @@ description: |
>>> msm8996
>>> msm8998
>>> qcs404
>>> + qcs8275
>>> + qcs8300
>>> qcs8550
>>> qcm2290
>>> qcm6490
>>> @@ -895,6 +897,12 @@ properties:
>>> - const: qcom,qcs404-evb
>>> - const: qcom,qcs404
>>>
>>> + - items:
>>> + - enum:
>>> + - qcom,qcs8300-ride
>>> + - const: qcom,qcs8275
>>
>> So the qcs8300 ride comes with non-safe SoC?
>>
>> Best regards,
>> Krzysztof
>>
> Both QCS8275 and QCS8300 SoC can reference qcs8300 ride board. Could you
> describe your suggestion in more detail?
I did not suggest anything. I am confused that you claim that every
qcs8300 is using the non-safe flavor of the SoC. I am fine with this but
I want to understand it and be sure you will not change it next month
when you learn what this means.
Best regards,
Krzysztof
Powered by blists - more mailing lists