[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <acd72984-4c04-40f1-9e0e-f84f6c566b37@kernel.org>
Date: Thu, 5 Sep 2024 08:57:45 +0200
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
To: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@...mens.com>, Nishanth Menon <nm@...com>,
Santosh Shilimkar <ssantosh@...nel.org>,
Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@...com>, Tero Kristo <kristo@...nel.org>,
Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-pci@...r.kernel.org,
Siddharth Vadapalli <s-vadapalli@...com>,
Bao Cheng Su <baocheng.su@...mens.com>, Hua Qian Li
<huaqian.li@...mens.com>, Diogo Ivo <diogo.ivo@...mens.com>,
Lorenzo Pieralisi <lpieralisi@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof WilczyĆski <kw@...ux.com>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/7] dt-bindings: PCI: ti,am65: Extend for use with PVU
On 04/09/2024 12:00, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> +
> + reg-names:
> + minItems: 4
> + items:
> + - const: app
> + - const: dbics
> + - const: config
> + - const: atu
> + - const: vmap_lp
> + - const: vmap_hp
> +
> + memory-region:
This also did not improve. You did not address any feedback from v3.
Missed feedback:
This *must* be defined in top-level.
I still think this must have some sort of maxItems. I accept your
explanation that you could have multiple memory pools, but I don't think
2147000 pools is possible. Make it 4, 8 or 32.
> + minItems: 1
> + description: |
> + phandle to one or more restricted DMA pools to be used for all devices
> + behind this controller. The regions should be defined according to
> + reserved-memory/shared-dma-pool.yaml.
> + items:
> + maxItems: 1
Best regards,
Krzysztof
Powered by blists - more mailing lists