[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5dedf51d8ec19b7b3bd0c6cb136048344f1c1007.camel@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 05 Sep 2024 10:40:39 +0200
From: Nuno Sá <noname.nuno@...il.com>
To: Guillaume Stols <gstols@...libre.com>, Uwe
Kleine-König <ukleinek@...nel.org>, Lars-Peter Clausen
<lars@...afoo.de>, Michael Hennerich <Michael.Hennerich@...log.com>,
Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>, Conor Dooley
<conor+dt@...nel.org>, Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>
Cc: linux-pwm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-fbdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-iio@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
20240705211452.1157967-2-u.kleine-koenig@...libre.com,
20240712171821.1470833-2-u.kleine-koenig@...libre.com,
cover.1721040875.git.u.kleine-koenig@...libre.com, aardelean@...libre.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 8/8] iio:adc:ad7606: Add iio-backend support
On Thu, 2024-08-15 at 12:12 +0000, Guillaume Stols wrote:
> - Basic support for iio backend.
> - Supports IIO_CHAN_INFO_SAMP_FREQ R/W.
> - Only hardware mode is available, and that IIO_CHAN_INFO_RAW is not
> supported if iio-backend mode is selected.
>
> A small correction was added to the driver's file name in the Kconfig
> file's description.
>
> Signed-off-by: Guillaume Stols <gstols@...libre.com>
> ---
Hi Guillaume,
Some initial feedback from me...
> drivers/iio/adc/Kconfig | 3 +-
> drivers/iio/adc/ad7606.c | 103 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
> -
> drivers/iio/adc/ad7606.h | 16 +++++++
> drivers/iio/adc/ad7606_par.c | 98 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> 4 files changed, 200 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/iio/adc/Kconfig b/drivers/iio/adc/Kconfig
> index 88e8ce2e78b3..01248b6df868 100644
> --- a/drivers/iio/adc/Kconfig
> +++ b/drivers/iio/adc/Kconfig
> @@ -227,9 +227,10 @@ config AD7606_IFACE_PARALLEL
> help
> Say yes here to build parallel interface support for Analog
> Devices:
> ad7605-4, ad7606, ad7606-6, ad7606-4 analog to digital converters
> (ADC).
> + It also support iio_backended devices for AD7606B.
>
> To compile this driver as a module, choose M here: the
> - module will be called ad7606_parallel.
> + module will be called ad7606_par.
>
> config AD7606_IFACE_SPI
> tristate "Analog Devices AD7606 ADC driver with spi interface
> support"
> diff --git a/drivers/iio/adc/ad7606.c b/drivers/iio/adc/ad7606.c
> index 99d5ca5c2348..a753d5caa9f8 100644
> --- a/drivers/iio/adc/ad7606.c
> +++ b/drivers/iio/adc/ad7606.c
> @@ -21,6 +21,7 @@
> #include <linux/util_macros.h>
> #include <linux/units.h>
>
> +#include <linux/iio/backend.h>
> #include <linux/iio/iio.h>
> #include <linux/iio/buffer.h>
> #include <linux/iio/sysfs.h>
> @@ -148,7 +149,15 @@ static int ad7606_set_sampling_freq(struct ad7606_state
> *st, unsigned long freq)
>
> static int ad7606_read_samples(struct ad7606_state *st)
> {
> - unsigned int num = st->chip_info->num_channels - 1;
> + unsigned int num = st->chip_info->num_channels;
> +
> + /*
> + * Timestamp channel does not contain sample, and no timestamp
> channel if
> + * backend is used.
> + */
> + if (!st->back)
> + num--;
> +
> u16 *data = st->data;
> int ret;
>
> @@ -220,11 +229,15 @@ static int ad7606_scan_direct(struct iio_dev *indio_dev,
> unsigned int ch)
> if (!ret)
> return ret;
> }
> - ret = wait_for_completion_timeout(&st->completion,
> - msecs_to_jiffies(1000));
> - if (!ret) {
> - ret = -ETIMEDOUT;
> - goto error_ret;
> +
> + /* backend manages interruptions by itself.*/
missing space before closing the comment (also not sure the comments adds much)
> + if (!st->back) {
> + ret = wait_for_completion_timeout(&st->completion,
> + msecs_to_jiffies(1000));
> + if (!ret) {
> + ret = -ETIMEDOUT;
> + goto error_ret;
> + }
> }
>
> ret = ad7606_read_samples(st);
> @@ -271,6 +284,12 @@ static int ad7606_read_raw(struct iio_dev *indio_dev,
> case IIO_CHAN_INFO_OVERSAMPLING_RATIO:
> *val = st->oversampling;
> return IIO_VAL_INT;
> + case IIO_CHAN_INFO_SAMP_FREQ:
> + pwm_get_state_hw(st->cnvst_pwm, &cnvst_pwm_state);
> + /* If the PWM is swinging, return the real frequency,
> otherwise 0 */
> + *val = ad7606_pwm_is_swinging(st) ?
> + DIV_ROUND_CLOSEST_ULL(NSEC_PER_SEC,
> cnvst_pwm_state.period) : 0;
> + return IIO_VAL_INT;
> }
> return -EINVAL;
> }
> @@ -360,6 +379,8 @@ static int ad7606_write_raw(struct iio_dev *indio_dev,
> return ret;
>
> return 0;
> + case IIO_CHAN_INFO_SAMP_FREQ:
> + return ad7606_set_sampling_freq(st, val);
> default:
> return -EINVAL;
> }
> @@ -482,7 +503,6 @@ static int ad7606_buffer_postenable(struct iio_dev
> *indio_dev)
> struct ad7606_state *st = iio_priv(indio_dev);
>
> gpiod_set_value(st->gpio_convst, 1);
> - ad7606_pwm_set_swing(st);
>
> return 0;
> }
> @@ -492,19 +512,53 @@ static int ad7606_buffer_predisable(struct iio_dev
> *indio_dev)
> struct ad7606_state *st = iio_priv(indio_dev);
>
> gpiod_set_value(st->gpio_convst, 0);
> - ad7606_pwm_set_low(st);
>
> return 0;
> }
>
> +static int ad7606_pwm_buffer_postenable(struct iio_dev *indio_dev)
> +{
> + struct ad7606_state *st = iio_priv(indio_dev);
> +
> + return ad7606_pwm_set_swing(st);
> +}
> +
> +static int ad7606_pwm_buffer_predisable(struct iio_dev *indio_dev)
> +{
> + struct ad7606_state *st = iio_priv(indio_dev);
> +
> + return ad7606_pwm_set_low(st);
> +}
Maybe I'm missing something but are we removing the gpiod calls?
> +
> +static int ad7606_update_scan_mode(struct iio_dev *indio_dev,
> + const unsigned long *scan_mask)
> +{
> + struct ad7606_state *st = iio_priv(indio_dev);
> +
> + /* The update scan mode is only for iio backend compatible drivers.
> + * If the specific update_scan_mode is not defined in the bus ops,
> + * just do nothing and return 0.
> + */
> + if (st->bops->update_scan_mode)
> + return st->bops->update_scan_mode(indio_dev, scan_mask);
> + else
> + return 0;
Redundant else
> +}
> +
> static const struct iio_buffer_setup_ops ad7606_buffer_ops = {
> .postenable = &ad7606_buffer_postenable,
> .predisable = &ad7606_buffer_predisable,
> };
>
> +static const struct iio_buffer_setup_ops ad7606_pwm_buffer_ops = {
> + .postenable = &ad7606_pwm_buffer_postenable,
> + .predisable = &ad7606_pwm_buffer_predisable,
> +};
> +
> static const struct iio_info ad7606_info_no_os_or_range = {
> .read_raw = &ad7606_read_raw,
> .validate_trigger = &ad7606_validate_trigger,
> + .update_scan_mode = &ad7606_update_scan_mode,
> };
>
> static const struct iio_info ad7606_info_os_and_range = {
> @@ -512,6 +566,7 @@ static const struct iio_info ad7606_info_os_and_range = {
> .write_raw = &ad7606_write_raw,
> .attrs = &ad7606_attribute_group_os_and_range,
> .validate_trigger = &ad7606_validate_trigger,
> + .update_scan_mode = &ad7606_update_scan_mode,
> };
>
> static const struct iio_info ad7606_info_os_range_and_debug = {
> @@ -520,6 +575,7 @@ static const struct iio_info
> ad7606_info_os_range_and_debug = {
> .debugfs_reg_access = &ad7606_reg_access,
> .attrs = &ad7606_attribute_group_os_and_range,
> .validate_trigger = &ad7606_validate_trigger,
> + .update_scan_mode = &ad7606_update_scan_mode,
> };
>
> static const struct iio_info ad7606_info_os = {
> @@ -527,6 +583,7 @@ static const struct iio_info ad7606_info_os = {
> .write_raw = &ad7606_write_raw,
> .attrs = &ad7606_attribute_group_os,
> .validate_trigger = &ad7606_validate_trigger,
> + .update_scan_mode = &ad7606_update_scan_mode,
> };
>
> static const struct iio_info ad7606_info_range = {
> @@ -534,6 +591,7 @@ static const struct iio_info ad7606_info_range = {
> .write_raw = &ad7606_write_raw,
> .attrs = &ad7606_attribute_group_range,
> .validate_trigger = &ad7606_validate_trigger,
> + .update_scan_mode = &ad7606_update_scan_mode,
> };
>
> static const struct iio_trigger_ops ad7606_trigger_ops = {
> @@ -602,8 +660,6 @@ int ad7606_probe(struct device *dev, int irq, void __iomem
> *base_address,
> indio_dev->channels = st->chip_info->channels;
> indio_dev->num_channels = st->chip_info->num_channels;
>
> - init_completion(&st->completion);
> -
> ret = ad7606_reset(st);
> if (ret)
> dev_warn(st->dev, "failed to RESET: no RESET GPIO
> specified\n");
> @@ -635,7 +691,7 @@ int ad7606_probe(struct device *dev, int irq, void __iomem
> *base_address,
> return ret;
> }
>
> - /* If convst pin is not defined, setup PWM*/
> + /* If convst pin is not defined, setup PWM */
> if (!st->gpio_convst) {
> st->cnvst_pwm = devm_pwm_get(dev, NULL);
> if (IS_ERR(st->cnvst_pwm))
> @@ -671,14 +727,25 @@ int ad7606_probe(struct device *dev, int irq, void
> __iomem *base_address,
> if (ret)
> return ret;
> }
> - ret = devm_request_threaded_irq(dev, irq,
> - NULL,
> - &ad7606_interrupt,
> - IRQF_TRIGGER_FALLING | IRQF_ONESHOT,
> - chip_info->name, indio_dev);
> - if (ret)
> - return ret;
>
> + if (st->bops->iio_backend_config) {
> + st->bops->iio_backend_config(dev, indio_dev);
> + indio_dev->setup_ops = &ad7606_pwm_buffer_ops;
Ignoring error code
> + } else {
> + /* Reserve the PWM use only for backend (force gpio_convst
> definition)*/
> + if (!st->gpio_convst)
> + return dev_err_probe(dev, -EINVAL,
> + "Convst pin must be defined when
> not in backend mode");
> +
> + init_completion(&st->completion);
> + ret = devm_request_threaded_irq(dev, irq,
> + NULL,
> + &ad7606_interrupt,
> + IRQF_TRIGGER_FALLING |
> IRQF_ONESHOT,
> + chip_info->name, indio_dev);
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
> + }
Are we still calling devm_iio_triggered_buffer_setup() in case we have a backend
device?
> return devm_iio_device_register(dev, indio_dev);
> }
...
>
> +#ifdef CONFIG_IIO_BACKEND
Not a fan of this #ifef... It's not that much code so I would just select
IIO_BACKEND for this driver. In fact, I don't think we can separately enable
IIO_BACKEND in the menuconfig menu?
> +static const struct iio_chan_spec ad7606b_bi_channels[] = {
> + AD7606_BI_CHANNEL(0),
> + AD7606_BI_CHANNEL(1),
> + AD7606_BI_CHANNEL(2),
> + AD7606_BI_CHANNEL(3),
> + AD7606_BI_CHANNEL(4),
> + AD7606_BI_CHANNEL(5),
> + AD7606_BI_CHANNEL(6),
> + AD7606_BI_CHANNEL(7),
> +};
> +
> +static int ad7606_bi_update_scan_mode(struct iio_dev *indio_dev, const
> unsigned long *scan_mask)
> +{
> + struct ad7606_state *st = iio_priv(indio_dev);
> + unsigned int c, ret;
> +
> + for (c = 0; c < indio_dev->num_channels; c++) {
> + if (test_bit(c, scan_mask))
> + ret = iio_backend_chan_enable(st->back, c);
> + else
> + ret = iio_backend_chan_disable(st->back, c);
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
> + }
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int ad7606_bi_setup_iio_backend(struct device *dev, struct iio_dev
> *indio_dev)
> +{
> + struct ad7606_state *st = iio_priv(indio_dev);
> + unsigned int ret, c;
> +
> + st->back = devm_iio_backend_get(dev, NULL);
> + if (IS_ERR(st->back))
> + return PTR_ERR(st->back);
> +
> + /* If the device is iio_backend powered the PWM is mandatory
> */
> + if (!st->cnvst_pwm)
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> + ret = devm_iio_backend_request_buffer(dev, st->back,
> indio_dev);
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
> +
> + ret = devm_iio_backend_enable(dev, st->back);
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
> +
> + struct iio_backend_data_fmt data = {
> + .sign_extend = true,
> + .enable = true,
> + };
I would follow typical kernel coding style and have this declared at the
beginning of the function.
> + for (c = 0; c < indio_dev->num_channels; c++) {
> + ret = iio_backend_data_format_set(st->back, c,
> &data);
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
> + }
> +
> + indio_dev->channels = ad7606b_bi_channels;
> + indio_dev->num_channels = 8;
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static const struct ad7606_bus_ops ad7606_bi_bops = {
> + .iio_backend_config = ad7606_bi_setup_iio_backend,
> + .update_scan_mode = ad7606_bi_update_scan_mode,
> +};
> +#endif
> +
> static int ad7606_par16_read_block(struct device *dev,
> int count, void *buf)
> {
> @@ -52,7 +130,20 @@ static int ad7606_par_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> void __iomem *addr;
> resource_size_t remap_size;
> int irq;
> -
> +#ifdef CONFIG_IIO_BACKEND
> + struct iio_backend *back;
> +
> + /*For now, only the AD7606B is backend compatible.*/
> + if (chip_info->has_backend) {
> + back = devm_iio_backend_get(&pdev->dev, NULL);
> + if (IS_ERR(back))
> + return PTR_ERR(back);
> +
> + return ad7606_probe(&pdev->dev, 0, NULL,
> + chip_info,
> + &ad7606_bi_bops);
> + }
> +#endif
Not sure I follow the above? You also get the backend in
ad7606_bi_setup_iio_backend()? So it seems to be that the has_backend flag is
not really needed?
- Nuno Sá
Powered by blists - more mailing lists