linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] arm64: dts: rockchip: Add a few aliases to the PineTab2 dtsi

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <6b51f810-438c-42fe-92c2-87966906b534@kernel.org>
Date: Thu, 5 Sep 2024 13:48:10 +0200
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
To: Dragan Simic <dsimic@...jaro.org>
Cc: linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org, heiko@...ech.de,
 linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
 robh@...nel.org, krzk+dt@...nel.org, conor+dt@...nel.org,
 linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Diederik de Haas <didi.debian@...ow.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm64: dts: rockchip: Add a few aliases to the PineTab2
 dtsi

On 05/09/2024 13:43, Dragan Simic wrote:
> Hello Krzysztof,
> 
> On 2024-09-05 13:39, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> On 05/09/2024 13:32, Dragan Simic wrote:
>>> Sprinkle a few commonly used aliases onto the PineTab2 dtsi file, to 
>>> improve
>>> its readability a bit, to make it easier to refer to the actual nodes 
>>> later,
>>> if needed, and to add a bit more detail to some of the labels.
>>>
>>> No functional changes are introduced, which was validated by 
>>> decompiling and
>>> comparing all affected board dtb files before and after these changes. 
>>>  When
>>> compared with the decompiled original dtb files, some of the phandles 
>>> in the
>>> updated dtb files have different values, and the updated dtb files 
>>> contain
>>> some additional phandles and additional symbols that come from the 
>>> introduced
>>> aliases, but they still effectively remain the same as the originals.
>>>
>>> Suggested-by: Diederik de Haas <didi.debian@...ow.org>
>>> Signed-off-by: Dragan Simic <dsimic@...jaro.org>
>>> ---
>>
>> Unused aliases do not improve readability, so for me this change is
>> making code worse without valid reason.
> 
> Then why do we already have, for example, unused "rk817_charger: 
> charger"
> aliases in quite a few board dts(i) files?  If those are actually seen 

Ask contributors...

> as
> redundant, we should remove all of them.

They are already there, so dropping them is close to unnecessary churn.
And quite a lot of work to investigate the reason behind EACH label.

Best regards,
Krzysztof