[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <6867F624-A83C-4A3C-947D-ECFA4925130F@linux.dev>
Date: Thu, 5 Sep 2024 20:23:05 +0800
From: Muchun Song <muchun.song@...ux.dev>
To: Qi Zheng <zhengqi.arch@...edance.com>
Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>,
Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>,
Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>,
"Vlastimil Babka (SUSE)" <vbabka@...nel.org>,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
rppt@...nel.org,
vishal.moola@...il.com,
peterx@...hat.com,
ryan.roberts@....com,
christophe.leroy2@...soprasteria.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 12/14] mm: multi-gen LRU: walk_pte_range() use
pte_offset_map_rw_nolock()
> On Sep 4, 2024, at 16:40, Qi Zheng <zhengqi.arch@...edance.com> wrote:
>
> In walk_pte_range(), we may modify the pte entry after holding the ptl, so
> convert it to using pte_offset_map_rw_nolock(). At this time, the
> pte_same() check is not performed after the ptl held, so we should get
> pmdval and do pmd_same() check to ensure the stability of pmd entry.
>
> Signed-off-by: Qi Zheng <zhengqi.arch@...edance.com>
Reviewed-by: Muchun Song <muchun.song@...ux.dev>
Thanks.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists