lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20240905124107.6954-2-pratikrajesh.sampat@amd.com>
Date: Thu, 5 Sep 2024 07:40:59 -0500
From: "Pratik R. Sampat" <pratikrajesh.sampat@....com>
To: <kvm@...r.kernel.org>
CC: <seanjc@...gle.com>, <pbonzini@...hat.com>, <pgonda@...gle.com>,
	<thomas.lendacky@....com>, <michael.roth@....com>, <shuah@...nel.org>,
	<linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH v3 1/9] KVM: selftests: Decouple SEV ioctls from asserts

Add variants of sev, sev-es launch path that return the status of the
ioctl call instead of asserting for success. This enables both positive
and negative testing of the path.

No functional impact intended.

Signed-off-by: Pratik R. Sampat <pratikrajesh.sampat@....com>
Tested-by: Peter Gonda <pgonda@...gle.com>
Tested-by: Srikanth Aithal <sraithal@....com>
---
 .../selftests/kvm/include/x86_64/sev.h        | 22 +++++-
 tools/testing/selftests/kvm/lib/x86_64/sev.c  | 78 +++++++++++++++----
 2 files changed, 80 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/include/x86_64/sev.h b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/include/x86_64/sev.h
index 82c11c81a956..3998152cc081 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/include/x86_64/sev.h
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/include/x86_64/sev.h
@@ -27,6 +27,12 @@ enum sev_guest_state {
 
 #define GHCB_MSR_TERM_REQ	0x100
 
+/* Variants of the SEV launch path that do not assert the ioctl status */
+int __sev_vm_launch_start(struct kvm_vm *vm, uint32_t policy);
+int __sev_vm_launch_update(struct kvm_vm *vm, uint32_t policy);
+int __sev_vm_launch_measure(struct kvm_vm *vm, uint8_t *measurement);
+int __sev_vm_launch_finish(struct kvm_vm *vm);
+
 void sev_vm_launch(struct kvm_vm *vm, uint32_t policy);
 void sev_vm_launch_measure(struct kvm_vm *vm, uint8_t *measurement);
 void sev_vm_launch_finish(struct kvm_vm *vm);
@@ -82,15 +88,23 @@ static inline void sev_register_encrypted_memory(struct kvm_vm *vm,
 	vm_ioctl(vm, KVM_MEMORY_ENCRYPT_REG_REGION, &range);
 }
 
-static inline void sev_launch_update_data(struct kvm_vm *vm, vm_paddr_t gpa,
-					  uint64_t size)
+static inline int __sev_launch_update_data(struct kvm_vm *vm, vm_paddr_t gpa,
+					   uint64_t hva, uint64_t size)
 {
 	struct kvm_sev_launch_update_data update_data = {
-		.uaddr = (unsigned long)addr_gpa2hva(vm, gpa),
+		.uaddr = hva,
 		.len = size,
 	};
 
-	vm_sev_ioctl(vm, KVM_SEV_LAUNCH_UPDATE_DATA, &update_data);
+	return __vm_sev_ioctl(vm, KVM_SEV_LAUNCH_UPDATE_DATA, &update_data);
+}
+
+static inline void sev_launch_update_data(struct kvm_vm *vm, vm_paddr_t gpa,
+					  uint64_t hva, uint64_t size)
+{
+	int ret = __sev_launch_update_data(vm, gpa, hva, size);
+
+	TEST_ASSERT_VM_VCPU_IOCTL(!ret, KVM_SEV_LAUNCH_UPDATE_DATA, ret, vm);
 }
 
 #endif /* SELFTEST_KVM_SEV_H */
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/lib/x86_64/sev.c b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/lib/x86_64/sev.c
index e9535ee20b7f..125a72246e09 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/lib/x86_64/sev.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/lib/x86_64/sev.c
@@ -14,15 +14,16 @@
  * and find the first range, but that's correct because the condition
  * expression would cause us to quit the loop.
  */
-static void encrypt_region(struct kvm_vm *vm, struct userspace_mem_region *region)
+static int encrypt_region(struct kvm_vm *vm, struct userspace_mem_region *region)
 {
 	const struct sparsebit *protected_phy_pages = region->protected_phy_pages;
 	const vm_paddr_t gpa_base = region->region.guest_phys_addr;
 	const sparsebit_idx_t lowest_page_in_region = gpa_base >> vm->page_shift;
 	sparsebit_idx_t i, j;
+	int ret;
 
 	if (!sparsebit_any_set(protected_phy_pages))
-		return;
+		return 0;
 
 	sev_register_encrypted_memory(vm, region);
 
@@ -30,8 +31,15 @@ static void encrypt_region(struct kvm_vm *vm, struct userspace_mem_region *regio
 		const uint64_t size = (j - i + 1) * vm->page_size;
 		const uint64_t offset = (i - lowest_page_in_region) * vm->page_size;
 
-		sev_launch_update_data(vm, gpa_base + offset, size);
+		ret = __sev_launch_update_data(vm, gpa_base + offset,
+					       (uint64_t)addr_gpa2hva(vm, gpa_base + offset),
+					       size);
+		if (ret)
+			return ret;
+
 	}
+
+	return 0;
 }
 
 void sev_vm_init(struct kvm_vm *vm)
@@ -60,38 +68,74 @@ void sev_es_vm_init(struct kvm_vm *vm)
 	}
 }
 
-void sev_vm_launch(struct kvm_vm *vm, uint32_t policy)
+int __sev_vm_launch_start(struct kvm_vm *vm, uint32_t policy)
 {
 	struct kvm_sev_launch_start launch_start = {
 		.policy = policy,
 	};
+
+	return __vm_sev_ioctl(vm, KVM_SEV_LAUNCH_START, &launch_start);
+}
+
+int __sev_vm_launch_update(struct kvm_vm *vm, uint32_t policy)
+{
 	struct userspace_mem_region *region;
-	struct kvm_sev_guest_status status;
 	int ctr;
 
-	vm_sev_ioctl(vm, KVM_SEV_LAUNCH_START, &launch_start);
-	vm_sev_ioctl(vm, KVM_SEV_GUEST_STATUS, &status);
+	hash_for_each(vm->regions.slot_hash, ctr, region, slot_node) {
+		int ret = encrypt_region(vm, region);
 
-	TEST_ASSERT_EQ(status.policy, policy);
-	TEST_ASSERT_EQ(status.state, SEV_GUEST_STATE_LAUNCH_UPDATE);
-
-	hash_for_each(vm->regions.slot_hash, ctr, region, slot_node)
-		encrypt_region(vm, region);
+		if (ret)
+			return ret;
+	}
 
 	if (policy & SEV_POLICY_ES)
 		vm_sev_ioctl(vm, KVM_SEV_LAUNCH_UPDATE_VMSA, NULL);
 
 	vm->arch.is_pt_protected = true;
+
+	return 0;
 }
 
-void sev_vm_launch_measure(struct kvm_vm *vm, uint8_t *measurement)
+int __sev_vm_launch_measure(struct kvm_vm *vm, uint8_t *measurement)
 {
 	struct kvm_sev_launch_measure launch_measure;
-	struct kvm_sev_guest_status guest_status;
 
 	launch_measure.len = 256;
 	launch_measure.uaddr = (__u64)measurement;
-	vm_sev_ioctl(vm, KVM_SEV_LAUNCH_MEASURE, &launch_measure);
+
+	return __vm_sev_ioctl(vm, KVM_SEV_LAUNCH_MEASURE, &launch_measure);
+}
+
+int __sev_vm_launch_finish(struct kvm_vm *vm)
+{
+	return __vm_sev_ioctl(vm, KVM_SEV_LAUNCH_FINISH, NULL);
+}
+
+void sev_vm_launch(struct kvm_vm *vm, uint32_t policy)
+{
+	struct kvm_sev_guest_status status;
+	int ret;
+
+	ret = __sev_vm_launch_start(vm, policy);
+	TEST_ASSERT_VM_VCPU_IOCTL(!ret, KVM_SEV_LAUNCH_START, ret, vm);
+
+	vm_sev_ioctl(vm, KVM_SEV_GUEST_STATUS, &status);
+
+	TEST_ASSERT_EQ(status.policy, policy);
+	TEST_ASSERT_EQ(status.state, SEV_GUEST_STATE_LAUNCH_UPDATE);
+
+	ret = __sev_vm_launch_update(vm, policy);
+	TEST_ASSERT_VM_VCPU_IOCTL(!ret, KVM_SEV_LAUNCH_UPDATE_DATA, ret, vm);
+}
+
+void sev_vm_launch_measure(struct kvm_vm *vm, uint8_t *measurement)
+{
+	struct kvm_sev_guest_status guest_status;
+	int ret;
+
+	ret = __sev_vm_launch_measure(vm, measurement);
+	TEST_ASSERT_VM_VCPU_IOCTL(!ret, KVM_SEV_LAUNCH_MEASURE, ret, vm);
 
 	vm_sev_ioctl(vm, KVM_SEV_GUEST_STATUS, &guest_status);
 	TEST_ASSERT_EQ(guest_status.state, SEV_GUEST_STATE_LAUNCH_SECRET);
@@ -100,13 +144,15 @@ void sev_vm_launch_measure(struct kvm_vm *vm, uint8_t *measurement)
 void sev_vm_launch_finish(struct kvm_vm *vm)
 {
 	struct kvm_sev_guest_status status;
+	int ret;
 
 	vm_sev_ioctl(vm, KVM_SEV_GUEST_STATUS, &status);
 	TEST_ASSERT(status.state == SEV_GUEST_STATE_LAUNCH_UPDATE ||
 		    status.state == SEV_GUEST_STATE_LAUNCH_SECRET,
 		    "Unexpected guest state: %d", status.state);
 
-	vm_sev_ioctl(vm, KVM_SEV_LAUNCH_FINISH, NULL);
+	ret = __sev_vm_launch_finish(vm);
+	TEST_ASSERT_VM_VCPU_IOCTL(!ret, KVM_SEV_LAUNCH_FINISH, ret, vm);
 
 	vm_sev_ioctl(vm, KVM_SEV_GUEST_STATUS, &status);
 	TEST_ASSERT_EQ(status.state, SEV_GUEST_STATE_RUNNING);
-- 
2.34.1


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ