lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <236f0c6d019e8c25301f3db0a5c9d4971a094eb9.camel@siemens.com> Date: Fri, 6 Sep 2024 13:52:32 +0000 From: "MOESSBAUER, Felix" <felix.moessbauer@...mens.com> To: "axboe@...nel.dk" <axboe@...nel.dk>, "asml.silence@...il.com" <asml.silence@...il.com> CC: "io-uring@...r.kernel.org" <io-uring@...r.kernel.org>, "cgroups@...r.kernel.org" <cgroups@...r.kernel.org>, "Bezdeka, Florian" <florian.bezdeka@...mens.com>, "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, "longman@...hat.com" <longman@...hat.com>, "stable@...r.kernel.org" <stable@...r.kernel.org>, "Schmidt, Adriaan" <adriaan.schmidt@...mens.com>, "dqminh@...udflare.com" <dqminh@...udflare.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] io_uring/sqpoll: inherit cpumask of creating process On Fri, 2024-09-06 at 07:47 -0600, Jens Axboe wrote: > On 9/6/24 7:44 AM, Felix Moessbauer wrote: > > The submit queue polling threads are "kernel" threads that are > > started > > It's not a kernel thread, it's a normal userland thread that just > never > exits to userspace. One more reason to behave like a userland thread. I used the term "kernel" thread as it was used in commit a5fc1441af as well, referring to the same thing. Shall I update the commit message? Best regards, Felix > > > from the userland. In case the userland task is part of a cgroup > > with > > the cpuset controller enabled, the poller should also stay within > > that > > cpuset. This also holds, as the poller belongs to the same cgroup > > as > > the task that started it. > > > > With the current implementation, a process can "break out" of the > > defined cpuset by creating sq pollers consuming CPU time on other > > CPUs, > > which is especially problematic for realtime applications. > > > > Part of this problem was fixed in a5fc1441 by dropping the > > PF_NO_SETAFFINITY flag, but this only becomes effective after the > > first > > modification of the cpuset (i.e. the pollers cpuset is correct > > after the > > first update of the enclosing cgroups cpuset). > > > > By inheriting the cpuset of the creating tasks, we ensure that the > > poller is created with a cpumask that is a subset of the cgroups > > mask. > > Inheriting the creators cpumask is reasonable, as other userland > > tasks > > also inherit the mask. > > Looks fine to me. > -- Siemens AG, Technology Linux Expert Center
Powered by blists - more mailing lists