linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 07/20] drm/bridge: tc358775: use regmap instead of open coded access functions

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <D3Z966PUEDVC.2HJCER9HHLTY7@kernel.org>
Date: Fri, 06 Sep 2024 15:58:18 +0200
From: "Michael Walle" <mwalle@...nel.org>
To: "Daniel Semkowicz" <dse@...umatec.com>
Cc: "Andrzej Hajda" <andrzej.hajda@...el.com>, "Neil Armstrong"
 <neil.armstrong@...aro.org>, "Robert Foss" <rfoss@...nel.org>, "Laurent
 Pinchart" <Laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com>, "Jonas Karlman"
 <jonas@...boo.se>, "Jernej Skrabec" <jernej.skrabec@...il.com>, "Maarten
 Lankhorst" <maarten.lankhorst@...ux.intel.com>, "Maxime Ripard"
 <mripard@...nel.org>, "Thomas Zimmermann" <tzimmermann@...e.de>, "David
 Airlie" <airlied@...il.com>, "Daniel Vetter" <daniel@...ll.ch>, "Chun-Kuang
 Hu" <chunkuang.hu@...nel.org>, "Philipp Zabel" <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>,
 "Matthias Brugger" <matthias.bgg@...il.com>, "AngeloGioacchino Del Regno"
 <angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com>, "Sam Ravnborg"
 <sam@...nborg.org>, "Vinay Simha BN" <simhavcs@...il.com>, "Tony Lindgren"
 <tony@...mide.com>, <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
 <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org>,
 <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 07/20] drm/bridge: tc358775: use regmap instead of open
 coded access functions

Hi Daniel,

On Fri Sep 6, 2024 at 3:47 PM CEST, Daniel Semkowicz wrote:
> >         tc->i2c = client;
>
> so the assignment above is no longer correct and should
> be also removed. Otherwise, this code will not compile.


Ahh yes. Thanks for noticing. I have a wip patch which I didn't
post, which had this line removed. Will post a new version soon.

Probably also going to split the patches because it seems due to
the controversy in patch 01/20 this whole series is ignored.

-michael

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (298 bytes)