lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZtsO-v3pUVezKBgE@x1>
Date: Fri, 6 Sep 2024 11:17:30 -0300
From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>
To: "Liang, Kan" <kan.liang@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: namhyung@...nel.org, irogers@...gle.com, jolsa@...nel.org,
	adrian.hunter@...el.com, linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] perf mem: Fix missed p-core mem events on ADL and RPL

On Thu, Sep 05, 2024 at 03:47:03PM -0400, Liang, Kan wrote:
> On 2024-09-05 3:33 p.m., Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> > On Thu, Sep 05, 2024 at 10:07:36AM -0700, kan.liang@...ux.intel.com wrote:
> >> From: Kan Liang <kan.liang@...ux.intel.com>
> >>
> >> The p-core mem events are missed when launching perf mem record on ADL
> >> and RPL.
> >>
> >> root@...ber:~# perf mem record sleep 1
> >> Memory events are enabled on a subset of CPUs: 16-27
> >> [ perf record: Woken up 1 times to write data ]
> >> [ perf record: Captured and wrote 0.032 MB perf.data ]
> >> root@...ber:~# perf evlist
> >> cpu_atom/mem-loads,ldlat=30/P
> >> cpu_atom/mem-stores/P
> >> dummy:u
> >>
> >> A variable 'record' in the struct perf_mem_event is to indicate whether
> >> a mem event in a mem_events[] should be recorded. The current code only
> >> configure the variable for the first eligible PMU. It's good enough for
> >> a non-hybrid machine or a hybrid machine which has the same
> >> mem_events[]. However, if a different mem_events[] is used for different
> >> PMUs on a hybrid machine, e.g., ADL or RPL, the 'record' for the second
> >> PMU never get a chance to be set. The mem_events[] of the second PMU
> >> are always ignored.
> >>
> >> Perf mem doesn't support the per-PMU configuration now. A
> >> per-PMU mem_events[] 'record' variable doesn't make sense. Make it
> >> global. That could also avoid searching for the per-PMU mem_events[]
> >> via perf_pmu__mem_events_ptr every time.
> >>
> >> Fixes: abbdd79b786e ("perf mem: Clean up perf_mem_events__name()")
> >> Reported-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>
> >> Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/Zthu81fA3kLC2CS2@x1/
> >> Signed-off-by: Kan Liang <kan.liang@...ux.intel.com>
> > 
> > Looks better:
> > 
> > root@...ber:~# perf report --header-only | grep 'cmdline\|event'
> > # cmdline : /home/acme/bin/perf mem record ls 
> > # event : name = cpu_atom/mem-loads,ldlat=30/P, , id = { 500, 501, 502, 503, 504, 505, 506, 507, 508, 509, 510, 511 }, type = 10 (cpu_atom), size = 136, config = 0x5d0 (mem-loads), { sample_period, sample_freq } = 4000, sample_type = IP|TID|TIME|ADDR|PERIOD|IDENTIFIER|DATA_SRC|WEIGHT_STRUCT, read_format = ID|LOST, disabled = 1, inherit = 1, freq = 1, enable_on_exec = 1, precise_ip = 3, sample_id_all = 1, { bp_addr, config1 } = 0x1f
> > # event : name = cpu_atom/mem-stores/P, , id = { 512, 513, 514, 515, 516, 517, 518, 519, 520, 521, 522, 523 }, type = 10 (cpu_atom), size = 136, config = 0x6d0 (mem-stores), { sample_period, sample_freq } = 4000, sample_type = IP|TID|TIME|ADDR|PERIOD|IDENTIFIER|DATA_SRC|WEIGHT_STRUCT, read_format = ID|LOST, disabled = 1, inherit = 1, freq = 1, enable_on_exec = 1, precise_ip = 3, sample_id_all = 1
> > # event : name = cpu_core/mem-loads-aux/, , id = { 524, 525, 526, 527, 528, 529, 530, 531, 532, 533, 534, 535, 536, 537, 538, 539 }, type = 4 (cpu_core), size = 136, config = 0x8203 (mem-loads-aux), { sample_period, sample_freq } = 4000, sample_type = IP|TID|TIME|ADDR|PERIOD|IDENTIFIER|DATA_SRC|WEIGHT_STRUCT, read_format = ID|LOST, disabled = 1, inherit = 1, freq = 1, enable_on_exec = 1, precise_ip = 3, sample_id_all = 1, exclude_guest = 1
> > # event : name = cpu_core/mem-loads,ldlat=30/, , id = { 541, 542, 543, 544, 545, 546, 547, 548, 549, 550, 551, 552, 553, 554, 555, 556 }, type = 4 (cpu_core), size = 136, config = 0x1cd (mem-loads), { sample_period, sample_freq } = 4000, sample_type = IP|TID|TIME|ADDR|PERIOD|IDENTIFIER|DATA_SRC|WEIGHT_STRUCT, read_format = ID|LOST, inherit = 1, freq = 1, precise_ip = 2, sample_id_all = 1, exclude_guest = 1, { bp_addr, config1 } = 0x1f
> > # event : name = cpu_core/mem-stores/P, , id = { 557, 558, 559, 560, 561, 562, 563, 564, 565, 566, 567, 568, 569, 570, 571, 572 }, type = 4 (cpu_core), size = 136, config = 0x2cd (mem-stores), { sample_period, sample_freq } = 4000, sample_type = IP|TID|TIME|ADDR|PERIOD|IDENTIFIER|DATA_SRC|WEIGHT_STRUCT, read_format = ID|LOST, disabled = 1, inherit = 1, freq = 1, enable_on_exec = 1, precise_ip = 3, sample_id_all = 1
> > # event : name = dummy:u, , id = { 573, 574, 575, 576, 577, 578, 579, 580, 581, 582, 583, 584, 585, 586, 587, 588, 589, 590, 591, 592, 593, 594, 595, 596, 597, 598, 599, 600 }, type = 1 (software), size = 136, config = 0x9 (PERF_COUNT_SW_DUMMY), { sample_period, sample_freq } = 1, sample_type = IP|TID|TIME|ADDR|IDENTIFIER|DATA_SRC|WEIGHT_STRUCT, read_format = ID|LOST, inherit = 1, exclude_kernel = 1, exclude_hv = 1, mmap = 1, comm = 1, task = 1, mmap_data = 1, sample_id_all = 1, exclude_guest = 1, mmap2 = 1, comm_exec = 1, ksymbol = 1, bpf_event = 1
> > # intel_pt pmu capabilities: topa_multiple_entries=1, psb_cyc=1, single_range_output=1, mtc_periods=249, ip_filtering=1, output_subsys=0, cr3_filtering=1, psb_periods=3f, event_trace=0, cycle_thresholds=3f, power_event_trace=0, mtc=1, payloads_lip=0, ptwrite=1, num_address_ranges=2, max_subleaf=1, topa_output=1, tnt_disable=0
> > root@...ber:~# perf evlist
> > cpu_atom/mem-loads,ldlat=30/P
> > cpu_atom/mem-stores/P
> > cpu_core/mem-loads-aux/
> > cpu_core/mem-loads,ldlat=30/
> > cpu_core/mem-stores/P
> > dummy:u
> > root@...ber:~#
> > 
> > But can we reconstruct the events relationship (group, :S, etc) from
> > what we have in the perf.data header?
> > 
> 
> Do you mean show the group relation in the perf evlist?
> 
> $perf mem record sleep 1
> [ perf record: Woken up 1 times to write data ]
> [ perf record: Captured and wrote 0.027 MB perf.data (10 samples) ]
> 
> $perf evlist -g
> cpu_atom/mem-loads,ldlat=30/P
> cpu_atom/mem-stores/P
> {cpu_core/mem-loads-aux/,cpu_core/mem-loads,ldlat=30/}
> cpu_core/mem-stores/P
> dummy:u
> 
> The -g option already did it, although the group modifier looks lost.

Right, I can reproduce that, but I wonder if we shouldn't make this '-g'
option the default?

-----

Committer testing:

  root@...ber:~# perf evlist -g
  cpu_atom/mem-loads,ldlat=30/P
  cpu_atom/mem-stores/P
  {cpu_core/mem-loads-aux/,cpu_core/mem-loads,ldlat=30/}
  cpu_core/mem-stores/P
  dummy:u
  root@...ber:~#

The :S for '{cpu_core/mem-loads-aux/,cpu_core/mem-loads,ldlat=30/}' is
not being added by 'perf evlist -g', to be checked.

-----

- Arnaldo

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ