[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <9ed92660-5f42-4a1a-9261-b8800133972a@linaro.org>
Date: Fri, 6 Sep 2024 18:56:22 +0300
From: Vladimir Zapolskiy <vladimir.zapolskiy@...aro.org>
To: Depeng Shao <quic_depengs@...cinc.com>, rfoss@...nel.org,
todor.too@...il.com, bryan.odonoghue@...aro.org, mchehab@...nel.org,
robh@...nel.org, krzk+dt@...nel.org, conor+dt@...nel.org
Cc: linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-media@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
kernel@...cinc.com, Yongsheng Li <quic_yon@...cinc.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 07/13] dt-bindings: media: camss: Add qcom,sm8550-camss
binding
Hi Depeng,
On 8/12/24 17:41, Depeng Shao wrote:
> Add bindings for qcom,sm8550-camss in order to support the camera
> subsystem for sm8550.
>
> Co-developed-by: Yongsheng Li <quic_yon@...cinc.com>
> Signed-off-by: Yongsheng Li <quic_yon@...cinc.com>
> Signed-off-by: Depeng Shao <quic_depengs@...cinc.com>
there are a few more things, which I noticed.
> +
> + soc {
> + #address-cells = <2>;
> + #size-cells = <2>;
> +
> + camss: camss@...4000 {
> + compatible = "qcom,sm8550-camss";
> +
> + reg = <0 0x0acb7000 0 0xd00>,
> + <0 0x0acb9000 0 0xd00>,
> + <0 0x0acbb000 0 0xd00>,
> + <0 0x0acca000 0 0xa00>,
> + <0 0x0acce000 0 0xa00>,
> + <0 0x0acb6000 0 0x1000>,
> + <0 0x0ace4000 0 0x2000>,
> + <0 0x0ace6000 0 0x2000>,
> + <0 0x0ace8000 0 0x2000>,
> + <0 0x0acea000 0 0x2000>,
> + <0 0x0acec000 0 0x2000>,
> + <0 0x0acee000 0 0x2000>,
> + <0 0x0acf0000 0 0x2000>,
> + <0 0x0acf2000 0 0x2000>,
> + <0 0x0ac62000 0 0xf000>,
> + <0 0x0ac71000 0 0xf000>,
> + <0 0x0ac80000 0 0xf000>,
> + <0 0x0accb000 0 0x2800>,
> + <0 0x0accf000 0 0x2800>;
Please sort the list above in numerical order, this will change positions
of "vfe_lite0", "vfe_lite1" etc.
Another note, since it's not possible to map less than a page, so I believe
it might make sense to align all sizes to 0x1000.
> + reg-names = "csid0",
> + "csid1",
> + "csid2",
> + "csid_lite0",
> + "csid_lite1",
> + "csid_top",
> + "csiphy0",
> + "csiphy1",
> + "csiphy2",
> + "csiphy3",
> + "csiphy4",
> + "csiphy5",
> + "csiphy6",
> + "csiphy7",
> + "vfe0",
> + "vfe1",
> + "vfe2",
> + "vfe_lite0",
> + "vfe_lite1";
> +
> + clocks = <&camcc CAM_CC_CAMNOC_AXI_CLK>,
> + <&camcc CAM_CC_CPAS_AHB_CLK>,
> + <&camcc CAM_CC_CPAS_FAST_AHB_CLK>,
> + <&camcc CAM_CC_CPAS_IFE_LITE_CLK>,
> + <&camcc CAM_CC_CPAS_IFE_0_CLK>,
> + <&camcc CAM_CC_CPAS_IFE_1_CLK>,
> + <&camcc CAM_CC_CPAS_IFE_2_CLK>,
> + <&camcc CAM_CC_CSID_CLK>,
> + <&camcc CAM_CC_CSIPHY0_CLK>,
> + <&camcc CAM_CC_CSI0PHYTIMER_CLK>,
> + <&camcc CAM_CC_CSIPHY1_CLK>,
> + <&camcc CAM_CC_CSI1PHYTIMER_CLK>,
> + <&camcc CAM_CC_CSIPHY2_CLK>,
> + <&camcc CAM_CC_CSI2PHYTIMER_CLK>,
> + <&camcc CAM_CC_CSIPHY3_CLK>,
> + <&camcc CAM_CC_CSI3PHYTIMER_CLK>,
> + <&camcc CAM_CC_CSIPHY4_CLK>,
> + <&camcc CAM_CC_CSI4PHYTIMER_CLK>,
> + <&camcc CAM_CC_CSIPHY5_CLK>,
> + <&camcc CAM_CC_CSI5PHYTIMER_CLK>,
> + <&camcc CAM_CC_CSIPHY6_CLK>,
> + <&camcc CAM_CC_CSI6PHYTIMER_CLK>,
> + <&camcc CAM_CC_CSIPHY7_CLK>,
> + <&camcc CAM_CC_CSI7PHYTIMER_CLK>,
> + <&camcc CAM_CC_CSID_CSIPHY_RX_CLK>,
> + <&camcc CAM_CC_IFE_0_CLK>,
> + <&camcc CAM_CC_IFE_0_FAST_AHB_CLK>,
> + <&camcc CAM_CC_IFE_1_CLK>,
> + <&camcc CAM_CC_IFE_1_FAST_AHB_CLK>,
> + <&camcc CAM_CC_IFE_2_CLK>,
> + <&camcc CAM_CC_IFE_2_FAST_AHB_CLK>,
> + <&camcc CAM_CC_IFE_LITE_CLK>,
> + <&camcc CAM_CC_IFE_LITE_AHB_CLK>,
> + <&camcc CAM_CC_IFE_LITE_CPHY_RX_CLK>,
> + <&camcc CAM_CC_IFE_LITE_CSID_CLK>,
> + <&gcc GCC_CAMERA_HF_AXI_CLK>;
Could you please put the &gcc provided clock as the first one in the list?
> +
> + clock-names = "camnoc_axi",
> + "cpas_ahb",
> + "cpas_fast_ahb_clk",
> + "cpas_ife_lite",
> + "cpas_vfe0",
> + "cpas_vfe1",
> + "cpas_vfe2",
> + "csid",
> + "csiphy0",
> + "csiphy0_timer",
> + "csiphy1",
> + "csiphy1_timer",
> + "csiphy2",
> + "csiphy2_timer",
> + "csiphy3",
> + "csiphy3_timer",
> + "csiphy4",
> + "csiphy4_timer",
> + "csiphy5",
> + "csiphy5_timer",
> + "csiphy6",
> + "csiphy6_timer",
> + "csiphy7",
> + "csiphy7_timer",
> + "csiphy_rx",
> + "vfe0",
> + "vfe0_fast_ahb",
> + "vfe1",
> + "vfe1_fast_ahb",
> + "vfe2",
> + "vfe2_fast_ahb",
> + "vfe_lite",
> + "vfe_lite_ahb",
> + "vfe_lite_cphy_rx",
> + "vfe_lite_csid",
> + "gcc_axi_hf";
> +
> + interconnects = <&gem_noc MASTER_APPSS_PROC 0 &config_noc SLAVE_CAMERA_CFG 0>,
> + <&mmss_noc MASTER_CAMNOC_HF 0 &mc_virt SLAVE_EBI1 0>,
> + <&mmss_noc MASTER_CAMNOC_ICP 0 &mc_virt SLAVE_EBI1 0>,
> + <&mmss_noc MASTER_CAMNOC_SF 0 &mc_virt SLAVE_EBI1 0>;
> + interconnect-names = "ahb",
> + "hf_0_mnoc",
> + "icp_mnoc",
> + "sf_0_mnoc";
Just a note for myself, interconnect names lost "cam_" prefix, and it should
be fine.
> +
> + interrupts = <GIC_SPI 601 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
> + <GIC_SPI 603 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
> + <GIC_SPI 431 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
> + <GIC_SPI 605 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
> + <GIC_SPI 376 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
> + <GIC_SPI 477 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
> + <GIC_SPI 478 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
> + <GIC_SPI 479 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
> + <GIC_SPI 448 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
> + <GIC_SPI 122 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
> + <GIC_SPI 89 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
> + <GIC_SPI 278 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
> + <GIC_SPI 277 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
> + <GIC_SPI 602 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
> + <GIC_SPI 604 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
> + <GIC_SPI 688 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
> + <GIC_SPI 606 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
> + <GIC_SPI 377 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
> +
> + interrupt-names = "csid0",
> + "csid1",
> + "csid2",
> + "csid_lite0",
> + "csid_lite1",
> + "csiphy0",
> + "csiphy1",
> + "csiphy2",
> + "csiphy3",
> + "csiphy4",
> + "csiphy5",
> + "csiphy6",
> + "csiphy7",
> + "vfe0",
> + "vfe1",
> + "vfe2",
> + "vfe_lite0",
> + "vfe_lite1";
> +
> + iommus = <&apps_smmu 0x800 0x20>;
> +
> + power-domains = <&camcc CAM_CC_IFE_0_GDSC>,
> + <&camcc CAM_CC_IFE_1_GDSC>,
> + <&camcc CAM_CC_IFE_2_GDSC>,
> + <&camcc CAM_CC_TITAN_TOP_GDSC>;
> +
> + power-domain-names = "ife0",
> + "ife1",
> + "ife2",
> + "top";
> +
> + vdda-phy-supply = <&vreg_l1e_0p88>;
> + vdda-pll-supply = <&vreg_l3e_1p2>;
> +
> + ports {
> + #address-cells = <1>;
> + #size-cells = <0>;
In case of a single child node #address-cells/#size-cells could be omitted,
if I'm not mistaken about it...
> + port@0 {
> + reg = <0>;
> + #address-cells = <1>;
> + #size-cells = <0>;
Same as above.
> +
> + csiphy_ep0: endpoint@0 {
> + reg = <0>;
> + clock-lanes = <7>;
> + data-lanes = <0 1>;
> + remote-endpoint = <&sensor_ep>;
> + };
> + };
> + };
> + };
> + };
--
Best wishes,
Vladimir
Powered by blists - more mailing lists