lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <f649c854-a250-43cf-ae01-82bbb011e7e0@kernel.org>
Date: Fri, 6 Sep 2024 18:49:49 +0200
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
To: Raviteja Laggyshetty <quic_rlaggysh@...cinc.com>,
 Georgi Djakov <djakov@...nel.org>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
 Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>, Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>
Cc: Konrad Dybcio <konradybcio@...nel.org>, Abel Vesa <abel.vesa@...aro.org>,
 Vladimir Lypak <vladimir.lypak@...il.com>,
 Adam Skladowski <a39.skl@...il.com>, Danila Tikhonov <danila@...xyga.com>,
 Neil Armstrong <neil.armstrong@...aro.org>,
 Andrew Halaney <ahalaney@...hat.com>,
 Odelu Kukatla <quic_okukatla@...cinc.com>,
 Mike Tipton <quic_mdtipton@...cinc.com>, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 1/2] dt-bindings: interconnect: Add compatibles for
 QCS8300 SoC

On 06/09/2024 17:15, Raviteja Laggyshetty wrote:
> QCS8300 SoC has several bus fabrics that could be controlled
> and tuned dynamically according to the bandwidth demand.

You got quite precise review about subject, which you partially
implemented and then added something more redundant. Look, this is
supposed to be device name. Add QCS8300 RPMh NoC. Drop redundant
information.



> 
> Signed-off-by: Raviteja Laggyshetty <quic_rlaggysh@...cinc.com>
> ---
>  .../interconnect/qcom,qcs8300-rpmh.yaml       |  72 +++++++
>  .../interconnect/qcom,qcs8300-rpmh.h          | 189 ++++++++++++++++++
>  2 files changed, 261 insertions(+)
>  create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/interconnect/qcom,qcs8300-rpmh.yaml
>  create mode 100644 include/dt-bindings/interconnect/qcom,qcs8300-rpmh.h
> 
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/interconnect/qcom,qcs8300-rpmh.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/interconnect/qcom,qcs8300-rpmh.yaml
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..2759b003ebcf
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/interconnect/qcom,qcs8300-rpmh.yaml
> @@ -0,0 +1,72 @@
> +# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only OR BSD-2-Clause
> +%YAML 1.2
> +---
> +$id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/interconnect/qcom,qcs8300-rpmh.yaml#
> +$schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml#
> +
> +title: Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. RPMh Network-On-Chip Interconnect on QCS8300

Isn't this just "Qualcomm"? How is in most of other bindings?

I asked not to send us your downstream stuff. I said it about driver,
though... so repeat here: Do not send downstream code, but work on
upstream and use upstream style. This applies to all patches: drivers,
DTS, bindings, everything. So which upstream binding was used as
template for this one here?

Best regards,
Krzysztof


Powered by blists - more mailing lists