[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20240906174941.1147197-2-costa.shul@redhat.com>
Date: Fri, 6 Sep 2024 20:49:36 +0300
From: Costa Shulyupin <costa.shul@...hat.com>
To: Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>,
Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@...il.com>,
Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@...roup.eu>,
Naveen N Rao <naveen@...nel.org>,
Costa Shulyupin <costa.shul@...hat.com>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: ming.lei@...hat.com
Subject: [PATCH] powerpc/xive: Use cpumask_intersects()
Replace `cpumask_any_and(a, b) >= nr_cpu_ids`
with the more readable `!cpumask_intersects(a, b)`.
Signed-off-by: Costa Shulyupin <costa.shul@...hat.com>
---
arch/powerpc/sysdev/xive/common.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/sysdev/xive/common.c b/arch/powerpc/sysdev/xive/common.c
index fa01818c1972c..a6c388bdf5d08 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/sysdev/xive/common.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/sysdev/xive/common.c
@@ -726,7 +726,7 @@ static int xive_irq_set_affinity(struct irq_data *d,
pr_debug("%s: irq %d/0x%x\n", __func__, d->irq, hw_irq);
/* Is this valid ? */
- if (cpumask_any_and(cpumask, cpu_online_mask) >= nr_cpu_ids)
+ if (!cpumask_intersects(cpumask, cpu_online_mask))
return -EINVAL;
/*
--
2.45.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists