linux-kernel - [PATCH RFC/RFT 0/2] arm64: dts: ti: k3-j784s4: Mark tps659413 and children as bootph-all

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20240906-j784s4-tps6594-bootph-v1-0-c5b58d43bf04@redhat.com>
Date: Fri, 06 Sep 2024 16:21:01 -0500
From: Andrew Halaney <ahalaney@...hat.com>
To: Nishanth Menon <nm@...com>, Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@...com>, 
 Tero Kristo <kristo@...nel.org>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, 
 Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>, 
 Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>
Cc: Keerthy <j-keerthy@...com>, Neha Malcom Francis <n-francis@...com>, 
 Eric Chanudet <echanude@...hat.com>, Enric Balletbo <eballetb@...hat.com>, 
 Udit Kumar <u-kumar1@...com>, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, 
 devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, 
 Andrew Halaney <ahalaney@...hat.com>
Subject: [PATCH RFC/RFT 0/2] arm64: dts: ti: k3-j784s4: Mark tps659413 and
 children as bootph-all

This series marks tps659413 and its children as bootph-all in order for
the nodes to be accessible during MCU's u-boot SPL.

This in turn is desired since the tps659413 needs its MCU ESM
state machine setup in order for the watchdog to reset the board.

This took me a little while to track down, as enabling the ESM, TPS6594,
etc in u-boot would result in the below boot failure:

    U-Boot SPL 2024.10-rc4-00007-g44b12cbcd1b3-dirty (Sep 06 2024 - 14:25:52 -0500)
    SYSFW ABI: 3.1 (firmware rev 0x0009 '9.2.4--v09.02.04 (Kool Koala)')
    Initialized 4 DRAM controllers
    SPL initial stack usage: 13408 bytes
    ### ERROR ### Please RESET the board ###

Which turns out to actually have failed far earlier in spl_early_init(),
due to these nodes not being accessible in u-boot. That's hard to tell
though since console isn't setup until later (and for that reason I
think spl_early_init()'s return value in j784s4_init.c isn't
evaluated since a panic() at that point would leave a user with *no*
information at all).

I've tested this in conjunction with a u-boot series which I'll link in
a follow-up response on the k3-j784s4-evm. I'd appreciate someone testing
on the k3-am69-sk at a minimum, as it should suffer the same fate if things
aren't setup appropriately.

Signed-off-by: Andrew Halaney <ahalaney@...hat.com>
---
Andrew Halaney (2):
      arm64: dts: ti: k3-j784s4-evm: Mark tps659413 and children as bootph-all
      arm64: dts: ti: k3-am69-sk: Mark tps659413 and children as bootph-all

 arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-am69-sk.dts    | 11 +++++++++++
 arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-j784s4-evm.dts | 11 +++++++++++
 2 files changed, 22 insertions(+)
---
base-commit: 9aaeb87ce1e966169a57f53a02ba05b30880ffb8
change-id: 20240906-j784s4-tps6594-bootph-19d3f00fb98a

Best regards,
-- 
Andrew Halaney <ahalaney@...hat.com>