lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <66db7469dbfdd_22a2294c0@dwillia2-xfh.jf.intel.com.notmuch> Date: Fri, 6 Sep 2024 14:30:17 -0700 From: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com> To: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>, Kai Huang <kai.huang@...el.com>, <dave.hansen@...el.com>, <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>, <tglx@...utronix.de>, <bp@...en8.de>, <peterz@...radead.org>, <mingo@...hat.com>, <hpa@...or.com>, <dan.j.williams@...el.com>, <seanjc@...gle.com>, <pbonzini@...hat.com> CC: <x86@...nel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <kvm@...r.kernel.org>, <rick.p.edgecombe@...el.com>, <isaku.yamahata@...el.com>, <chao.gao@...el.com>, <binbin.wu@...ux.intel.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/8] x86/virt/tdx: Remove 'struct field_mapping' and implement TD_SYSINFO_MAP() macro Adrian Hunter wrote: [..] > Another possibility is to put the macro at the invocation site: > > #define READ_SYS_INFO(_field_id, _member) \ > ret = ret ?: read_sys_metadata_field16(MD_FIELD_ID_##_field_id, \ > &sysinfo_tdmr->_member) > > READ_SYS_INFO(MAX_TDMRS, max_tdmrs); > READ_SYS_INFO(MAX_RESERVED_PER_TDMR, max_reserved_per_tdmr); > READ_SYS_INFO(PAMT_4K_ENTRY_SIZE, pamt_entry_size[TDX_PS_4K]); > READ_SYS_INFO(PAMT_2M_ENTRY_SIZE, pamt_entry_size[TDX_PS_2M]); > READ_SYS_INFO(PAMT_1G_ENTRY_SIZE, pamt_entry_size[TDX_PS_1G]); > > #undef READ_SYS_INFO > > And so on in later patches: > > #define READ_SYS_INFO(_field_id, _member) \ > ret = ret ?: read_sys_metadata_field(MD_FIELD_ID_##_field_id, \ > &sysinfo_version->_member) > > READ_SYS_INFO(MAJOR_VERSION, major); > READ_SYS_INFO(MINOR_VERSION, minor); > READ_SYS_INFO(UPDATE_VERSION, update); > READ_SYS_INFO(INTERNAL_VERSION, internal); > READ_SYS_INFO(BUILD_NUM, build_num); > READ_SYS_INFO(BUILD_DATE, build_date); > > #undef READ_SYS_INFO Looks like a reasonable enhancement to me.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists