[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZtqTTZizT7nAaYzq@google.com>
Date: Thu, 5 Sep 2024 22:29:49 -0700
From: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>
To: Danila Tikhonov <danila@...xyga.com>
Cc: hadess@...ess.net, hdegoede@...hat.com, neil.armstrong@...aro.org,
jeff@...undy.com, krzk@...nel.org, linux-input@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux@...nlining.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Input: goodix-berlin - Fix VDDIO regulator name
according to dt-bindings
Hi Danila,
On Mon, Aug 05, 2024 at 06:58:06PM +0300, Danila Tikhonov wrote:
> The dt-bindings specify the regulator as "vddio" instead of "iovdd".
>
> This patch fixes the regulator name from "iovdd" to "vddio" in the
> driver code to align with the dt-bindings. Fixing the dt-bindings
> would break ABI, hence the fix is made in the driver instead.
>
> There are no users of this regulator сurrently.
If there are no users (and the binding is pretty new) we should consider
all options. Do you know the name of the supply in the datasheet?
Thanks.
--
Dmitry
Powered by blists - more mailing lists