lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <35d882417c0a9c37e51b878790e2fa31dd0a1d63.camel@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 06 Sep 2024 07:42:52 +0200
From: Nuno Sá <noname.nuno@...il.com>
To: David Lechner <dlechner@...libre.com>, Angelo Dureghello
 <adureghello@...libre.com>, Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@...afoo.de>, Michael
 Hennerich <Michael.Hennerich@...log.com>, Nuno Sá
 <nuno.sa@...log.com>,  Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>, Rob Herring
 <robh@...nel.org>, Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>, Conor Dooley
 <conor+dt@...nel.org>, Olivier Moysan <olivier.moysan@...s.st.com>
Cc: linux-iio@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org, 
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/9] iio: backend adi-axi-dac: add registering of
 child fdt node

On Thu, 2024-09-05 at 14:19 -0500, David Lechner wrote:
> On 9/5/24 10:17 AM, Angelo Dureghello wrote:
> > From: Angelo Dureghello <adureghello@...libre.com>
> > 
> > Change to obtain the fdt use case as reported in the
> > adi,ad3552r.yaml file in this patchset, with the DAC device that
> > is actually using the backend set as a child node of the backend.
> > 
> > To obtain this, registering all the child fdt nodes as platform
> > devices.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Angelo Dureghello <adureghello@...libre.com>
> > Co-developed-by: David Lechner <dlechner@...libre.com>
> > Co-developed-by: Nuno Sá <nuno.sa@...log.com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/iio/dac/adi-axi-dac.c | 15 +++++++++++++++
> >  1 file changed, 15 insertions(+)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/iio/dac/adi-axi-dac.c b/drivers/iio/dac/adi-axi-dac.c
> > index cc31e1dcd1df..e883cd557b6a 100644
> > --- a/drivers/iio/dac/adi-axi-dac.c
> > +++ b/drivers/iio/dac/adi-axi-dac.c
> > @@ -783,6 +783,7 @@ static int axi_dac_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> >  {
> >  	struct axi_dac_state *st;
> >  	const struct axi_dac_info *info;
> > +	struct platform_device *child_pdev;
> >  	void __iomem *base;
> >  	unsigned int ver;
> >  	struct clk *clk;
> > @@ -862,6 +863,20 @@ static int axi_dac_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> >  		return dev_err_probe(&pdev->dev, ret,
> >  				     "failed to register iio backend\n");
> >  
> > +	device_for_each_child_node_scoped(&pdev->dev, child) {
> 
> This should use fwnode_for_each_available_child_node() so that it skips
> nodes with status != "okay".
> 

device_for_each_child_node() already only looks at available nodes IIRC

- Nuno Sá


Powered by blists - more mailing lists