[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87h6atfdiw.wl-tiwai@suse.de>
Date: Fri, 06 Sep 2024 09:27:03 +0200
From: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.de>
To: Jerome Brunet <jbrunet@...libre.com>
Cc: Jaroslav Kysela <perex@...ex.cz>,
Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.com>,
David Rhodes <david.rhodes@...rus.com>,
Richard Fitzgerald <rf@...nsource.cirrus.com>,
Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
Cezary Rojewski <cezary.rojewski@...el.com>,
Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@...ux.intel.com>,
Liam Girdwood <liam.r.girdwood@...ux.intel.com>,
Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@...ux.intel.com>,
Bard Liao <yung-chuan.liao@...ux.intel.com>,
Ranjani Sridharan <ranjani.sridharan@...ux.intel.com>,
Kai Vehmanen <kai.vehmanen@...ux.intel.com>,
Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@...aro.org>,
Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@...e.org>,
Jernej Skrabec <jernej.skrabec@...il.com>,
Samuel Holland <samuel@...lland.org>,
linux-sound@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
patches@...nsource.cirrus.com,
alsa-devel@...a-project.org,
linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-sunxi@...ts.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/13] ALSA: update sample rate definitions
On Thu, 05 Sep 2024 16:12:51 +0200,
Jerome Brunet wrote:
>
> This patchset adds rate definitions for 12kHz, 24kHz and 128kHz.
>
> It is follow-up on the series/discussion [0] about adding 128kHz for
> spdif/eARC support. The outcome was to add 12kHz and 24kHz as well and
> clean up the drivers that no longer require custom rules to allow these
> rates.
>
> Identifying these drivers is not straight forward, I tried my best but I
> may have missed some. Those will continue to work anyway so it is not
> critical. Some drivers using these rates have not been changed on
> purpose. The reason for this may be:
> * The driver used other uncommon rates that still don't have a definition
> so a custom rule is still required.
> * The constraint structure is used in some other way by the driver and
> removing it would not help the readability or maintainability. This is
> the case the freescale asrc drivers for example.
>
> There is one change per driver so, if there is a problem later on, it will
> easier to properly add Fixes tag.
>
> The series has been tested with
> * ARM64 defconfig - spdif 128kHz at runtime.
> * x86_64 allmodconfig - compile test only
>
> Last, the change adding IEC958 definitions has been dropped for this
> patchset and will be resent separately
>
> [0]: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240628122429.2018059-1-jbrunet@baylibre.com/
>
> ---
> Jerome Brunet (13):
> ALSA: pcm: add more sample rate definitions
> ALSA: cmipci: drop SNDRV_PCM_RATE_KNOT
> ALSA: emu10k1: drop SNDRV_PCM_RATE_KNOT
> ALSA: hdsp: drop SNDRV_PCM_RATE_KNOT
> ALSA: hdspm: drop SNDRV_PCM_RATE_KNOT
> ASoC: cs35l36: drop SNDRV_PCM_RATE_KNOT
> ASoC: cs35l41: drop SNDRV_PCM_RATE_KNOT
> ASoC: cs53l30: drop SNDRV_PCM_RATE_KNOT
> ASoC: Intel: avs: drop SNDRV_PCM_RATE_KNOT
> ASoC: qcom: q6asm-dai: drop SNDRV_PCM_RATE_KNOT
> ASoC: sunxi: sun4i-codec: drop SNDRV_PCM_RATE_KNOT
> ASoC: cs35l34: drop useless rate contraint
> ASoC: spdif: extend supported rates to 768kHz
A nice cleanup series.
Applied all now to for-next branch.
Thanks!
Takashi
Powered by blists - more mailing lists