linux-kernel - [PATCH net-next v18 08/14] mm: page_frag: use __alloc_pages() to replace alloc_pages

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20240906073646.2930809-9-linyunsheng@huawei.com>
Date: Fri, 6 Sep 2024 15:36:40 +0800
From: Yunsheng Lin <linyunsheng@...wei.com>
To: <davem@...emloft.net>, <kuba@...nel.org>, <pabeni@...hat.com>
CC: <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Yunsheng Lin
	<linyunsheng@...wei.com>, Alexander Duyck <alexander.duyck@...il.com>, Andrew
 Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, <linux-mm@...ck.org>
Subject: [PATCH net-next v18 08/14] mm: page_frag: use __alloc_pages() to replace alloc_pages_node()

It seems there is about 24Bytes binary size increase for
__page_frag_cache_refill() after refactoring in arm64 system
with 64K PAGE_SIZE. By doing the gdb disassembling, It seems
we can have more than 100Bytes decrease for the binary size
by using __alloc_pages() to replace alloc_pages_node(), as
there seems to be some unnecessary checking for nid being
NUMA_NO_NODE, especially when page_frag is part of the mm
system.

CC: Alexander Duyck <alexander.duyck@...il.com>
Signed-off-by: Yunsheng Lin <linyunsheng@...wei.com>
---
 mm/page_frag_cache.c | 6 +++---
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/mm/page_frag_cache.c b/mm/page_frag_cache.c
index 6f6e47bbdc8d..a5448b44068a 100644
--- a/mm/page_frag_cache.c
+++ b/mm/page_frag_cache.c
@@ -61,11 +61,11 @@ static struct page *__page_frag_cache_refill(struct page_frag_cache *nc,
 #if (PAGE_SIZE < PAGE_FRAG_CACHE_MAX_SIZE)
 	gfp_mask = (gfp_mask & ~__GFP_DIRECT_RECLAIM) |  __GFP_COMP |
 		   __GFP_NOWARN | __GFP_NORETRY | __GFP_NOMEMALLOC;
-	page = alloc_pages_node(NUMA_NO_NODE, gfp_mask,
-				PAGE_FRAG_CACHE_MAX_ORDER);
+	page = __alloc_pages(gfp_mask, PAGE_FRAG_CACHE_MAX_ORDER,
+			     numa_mem_id(), NULL);
 #endif
 	if (unlikely(!page)) {
-		page = alloc_pages_node(NUMA_NO_NODE, gfp, 0);
+		page = __alloc_pages(gfp, 0, numa_mem_id(), NULL);
 		order = 0;
 	}
 
-- 
2.33.0