[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <172562388689.2321398.11794976470240341493.b4-ty@kernel.org>
Date: Fri, 6 Sep 2024 13:29:28 +0100
From: Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>
To: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>
Cc: catalin.marinas@....com,
kernel-team@...roid.com,
Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
mark.rutland@....com,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] perf/arm-cmn: Clean up unnecessary NUMA_NO_NODE check
On Wed, 04 Sep 2024 19:41:54 +0100, Robin Murphy wrote:
> Checking for NUMA_NO_NODE is a misleading and, on reflection, entirely
> unnecessary micro-optimisation. If it ever did happen that an incoming
> CPU has no NUMA affinity while the current CPU does, a questionably-
> useful PMU migration isn't the biggest thing wrong with that picture...
>
>
Applied to will (for-next/perf), thanks!
[1/2] perf/arm-cmn: Clean up unnecessary NUMA_NO_NODE check
https://git.kernel.org/will/c/f04b611e6650
[2/2] perf/arm-cmn: Improve format attr printing
https://git.kernel.org/will/c/f32efa3e4bba
Cheers,
--
Will
https://fixes.arm64.dev
https://next.arm64.dev
https://will.arm64.dev
Powered by blists - more mailing lists