lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <b8dfda0c-11fc-4b2d-b47d-f234cde87cfa@baylibre.com>
Date: Fri, 6 Sep 2024 08:52:12 -0500
From: David Lechner <dlechner@...libre.com>
To: Nuno Sá <noname.nuno@...il.com>,
 Angelo Dureghello <adureghello@...libre.com>,
 Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@...afoo.de>,
 Michael Hennerich <Michael.Hennerich@...log.com>,
 Nuno Sá <nuno.sa@...log.com>,
 Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
 Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>, Conor Dooley
 <conor+dt@...nel.org>, Olivier Moysan <olivier.moysan@...s.st.com>
Cc: linux-iio@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/9] iio: backend adi-axi-dac: add registering of child
 fdt node

On 9/6/24 12:42 AM, Nuno Sá wrote:
> On Thu, 2024-09-05 at 14:19 -0500, David Lechner wrote:
>> On 9/5/24 10:17 AM, Angelo Dureghello wrote:
>>> From: Angelo Dureghello <adureghello@...libre.com>
>>>
>>> Change to obtain the fdt use case as reported in the
>>> adi,ad3552r.yaml file in this patchset, with the DAC device that
>>> is actually using the backend set as a child node of the backend.
>>>
>>> To obtain this, registering all the child fdt nodes as platform
>>> devices.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Angelo Dureghello <adureghello@...libre.com>
>>> Co-developed-by: David Lechner <dlechner@...libre.com>
>>> Co-developed-by: Nuno Sá <nuno.sa@...log.com>
>>> ---
>>>  drivers/iio/dac/adi-axi-dac.c | 15 +++++++++++++++
>>>  1 file changed, 15 insertions(+)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/iio/dac/adi-axi-dac.c b/drivers/iio/dac/adi-axi-dac.c
>>> index cc31e1dcd1df..e883cd557b6a 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/iio/dac/adi-axi-dac.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/iio/dac/adi-axi-dac.c
>>> @@ -783,6 +783,7 @@ static int axi_dac_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>>>  {
>>>  	struct axi_dac_state *st;
>>>  	const struct axi_dac_info *info;
>>> +	struct platform_device *child_pdev;
>>>  	void __iomem *base;
>>>  	unsigned int ver;
>>>  	struct clk *clk;
>>> @@ -862,6 +863,20 @@ static int axi_dac_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>>>  		return dev_err_probe(&pdev->dev, ret,
>>>  				     "failed to register iio backend\n");
>>>  
>>> +	device_for_each_child_node_scoped(&pdev->dev, child) {
>>
>> This should use fwnode_for_each_available_child_node() so that it skips
>> nodes with status != "okay".
>>
> 
> device_for_each_child_node() already only looks at available nodes IIRC
> 
> - Nuno Sá
> 

Ah, you are right, I did not dig deep enough.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists