| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <202409071245.bkGWWtfQ-lkp@intel.com>
Date: Sat, 7 Sep 2024 12:42:15 +0800
From: kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
To: KobaK <kobak@...dia.com>, Matt Ochs <mochs@...dia.com>,
James Morse <james.morse@....com>,
"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>, linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@...el.com>
Cc: llvm@...ts.linux.dev, oe-kbuild-all@...ts.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH V3] acpi/prmt: find block with specific type
Hi KobaK,
kernel test robot noticed the following build warnings:
[auto build test WARNING on rafael-pm/linux-next]
[also build test WARNING on rafael-pm/bleeding-edge linus/master v6.11-rc6 next-20240906]
[If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note.
And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in
https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information]
url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/KobaK/acpi-prmt-find-block-with-specific-type/20240905-205316
base: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/rafael/linux-pm.git linux-next
patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240905124950.512973-1-kobak%40nvidia.com
patch subject: [PATCH V3] acpi/prmt: find block with specific type
config: x86_64-rhel-8.3-rust (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20240907/202409071245.bkGWWtfQ-lkp@intel.com/config)
compiler: clang version 18.1.5 (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project 617a15a9eac96088ae5e9134248d8236e34b91b1)
reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20240907/202409071245.bkGWWtfQ-lkp@intel.com/reproduce)
If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
| Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
| Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202409071245.bkGWWtfQ-lkp@intel.com/
All warnings (new ones prefixed by >>):
>> drivers/acpi/prmt.c:163:5: warning: format specifies type 'int' but the argument has type 'u64' (aka 'unsigned long long') [-Wformat]
162 | "Idx: %d, Parts of handler(GUID: %pUB) are missed, handler_addr %llx, data_addr %llx, param_addr %llx",
| ~~
| %llu
163 | cur_handler, th->handler_addr,
| ^~~~~~~~~~~
include/linux/printk.h:518:37: note: expanded from macro 'pr_warn'
518 | printk(KERN_WARNING pr_fmt(fmt), ##__VA_ARGS__)
| ~~~ ^~~~~~~~~~~
include/linux/printk.h:465:60: note: expanded from macro 'printk'
465 | #define printk(fmt, ...) printk_index_wrap(_printk, fmt, ##__VA_ARGS__)
| ~~~ ^~~~~~~~~~~
include/linux/printk.h:437:19: note: expanded from macro 'printk_index_wrap'
437 | _p_func(_fmt, ##__VA_ARGS__); \
| ~~~~ ^~~~~~~~~~~
>> drivers/acpi/prmt.c:162:105: warning: more '%' conversions than data arguments [-Wformat-insufficient-args]
162 | "Idx: %d, Parts of handler(GUID: %pUB) are missed, handler_addr %llx, data_addr %llx, param_addr %llx",
| ~~~^
include/linux/printk.h:518:29: note: expanded from macro 'pr_warn'
518 | printk(KERN_WARNING pr_fmt(fmt), ##__VA_ARGS__)
| ^~~
include/linux/printk.h:355:21: note: expanded from macro 'pr_fmt'
355 | #define pr_fmt(fmt) fmt
| ^~~
include/linux/printk.h:465:53: note: expanded from macro 'printk'
465 | #define printk(fmt, ...) printk_index_wrap(_printk, fmt, ##__VA_ARGS__)
| ^~~
include/linux/printk.h:437:11: note: expanded from macro 'printk_index_wrap'
437 | _p_func(_fmt, ##__VA_ARGS__); \
| ^~~~
2 warnings generated.
vim +163 drivers/acpi/prmt.c
93
94 static int __init
95 acpi_parse_prmt(union acpi_subtable_headers *header, const unsigned long end)
96 {
97 struct acpi_prmt_module_info *module_info;
98 struct acpi_prmt_handler_info *handler_info;
99 struct prm_handler_info *th;
100 struct prm_module_info *tm;
101 u64 *mmio_count;
102 u64 cur_handler = 0;
103 u32 module_info_size = 0;
104 u64 mmio_range_size = 0;
105 void *temp_mmio;
106
107 module_info = (struct acpi_prmt_module_info *) header;
108 module_info_size = struct_size(tm, handlers, module_info->handler_info_count);
109 tm = kmalloc(module_info_size, GFP_KERNEL);
110 if (!tm)
111 goto parse_prmt_out1;
112
113 guid_copy(&tm->guid, (guid_t *) module_info->module_guid);
114 tm->major_rev = module_info->major_rev;
115 tm->minor_rev = module_info->minor_rev;
116 tm->handler_count = module_info->handler_info_count;
117 tm->updatable = true;
118
119 if (module_info->mmio_list_pointer) {
120 /*
121 * Each module is associated with a list of addr
122 * ranges that it can use during the service
123 */
124 mmio_count = (u64 *) memremap(module_info->mmio_list_pointer, 8, MEMREMAP_WB);
125 if (!mmio_count)
126 goto parse_prmt_out2;
127
128 mmio_range_size = struct_size(tm->mmio_info, addr_ranges, *mmio_count);
129 tm->mmio_info = kmalloc(mmio_range_size, GFP_KERNEL);
130 if (!tm->mmio_info)
131 goto parse_prmt_out3;
132
133 temp_mmio = memremap(module_info->mmio_list_pointer, mmio_range_size, MEMREMAP_WB);
134 if (!temp_mmio)
135 goto parse_prmt_out4;
136 memmove(tm->mmio_info, temp_mmio, mmio_range_size);
137 } else {
138 tm->mmio_info = kmalloc(sizeof(*tm->mmio_info), GFP_KERNEL);
139 if (!tm->mmio_info)
140 goto parse_prmt_out2;
141
142 tm->mmio_info->mmio_count = 0;
143 }
144
145 INIT_LIST_HEAD(&tm->module_list);
146 list_add(&tm->module_list, &prm_module_list);
147
148 handler_info = get_first_handler(module_info);
149 do {
150 th = &tm->handlers[cur_handler];
151
152 guid_copy(&th->guid, (guid_t *)handler_info->handler_guid);
153 th->handler_addr =
154 (void *)efi_pa_va_lookup(handler_info->handler_address, EFI_RUNTIME_SERVICES_CODE);
155 th->static_data_buffer_addr =
156 efi_pa_va_lookup(handler_info->static_data_buffer_address, EFI_RUNTIME_SERVICES_DATA);
157 th->acpi_param_buffer_addr =
158 efi_pa_va_lookup(handler_info->acpi_param_buffer_address, EFI_RUNTIME_SERVICES_DATA);
159
160 if (!th->handler_addr || !th->static_data_buffer_addr || !th->acpi_param_buffer_addr)
161 pr_warn(
> 162 "Idx: %d, Parts of handler(GUID: %pUB) are missed, handler_addr %llx, data_addr %llx, param_addr %llx",
> 163 cur_handler, th->handler_addr,
164 th->static_data_buffer_addr, th->acpi_param_buffer_addr);
165 } while (++cur_handler < tm->handler_count && (handler_info = get_next_handler(handler_info)));
166
167 return 0;
168
169 parse_prmt_out4:
170 kfree(tm->mmio_info);
171 parse_prmt_out3:
172 memunmap(mmio_count);
173 parse_prmt_out2:
174 kfree(tm);
175 parse_prmt_out1:
176 return -ENOMEM;
177 }
178
--
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki
Powered by blists - more mailing lists